SDF Chatter

4,983 readers
98 users here now
founded 2 years ago
ADMINS
SDF

Support for this instance is greatly appreciated at https://sdf.org/support

1
2
3
10
Rats Play Doom (ratsplaydoom.com)
submitted 10 hours ago by monica_b1998@lemmy.world to c/doom
4
 
 

There is no such thing as competition. As soon as a business does something that sets it apart, it's immediately hounded by business school people who want to profit off of lowering standards and raising prices.

It's why everything is so expensive and wages are trash. The whole point of going to business school is to ensure that businesses are always doing the bare minimum while charging the maximum people are willing to pay.

5
46
submitted 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) by evenwicht to c/iot
 
 

Obviously unwise consumers with an under-developed sense of privacy and security are happy to buy any and all kinds of smart appliances. Marketing works wonders on people -- esp. these people who see only the benefits and have a huge blind spot on the anti-feature realities.

So I am left wondering: do I need to cancel ALL smart appliances? The reason to even ask is that the market and demand for non-smart appliances is shrinking. So our choices will increasingly approach a buy a smart-appliance or nothing dichotomy. Televisions are likely already there. Before we reach that dichotomy on large appliances, the non-smart appliances will just be a bad deal because of lack of competition.

Obviously there is a possibility to buy a wi-fi dishwasher then either disable it or not give it a means of connection. But then there is a risk of sacrificing functionality. Not just upgrades but a risk that the appliance is IoT-dependent out of the box.

ATM, I think the only sensible approach is to simply cancel all smart appliances and only buy non-smart appliances. Is there a quick and easy way to separate the cloud-dependent smart appliances from the non-cloud-dependent smart appliances?

6
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/47171718

The guy could not use “Convection Roast” mode in his oven unless he connects to wi-fi and registers personal data. Apparently because this was a cook mode that was added after the oven was marketed.

Sure, it is useful to be able to get new features and upgrades after the thing is produced. But because of that, it’s as if they are making the store version deliberately excessively basic in order to twist people’s arms to run their proprietary closed-source spyware.

I was originally going to tag this as [a/d] (for asshole design), but opted to call it crappy design because upgradability is still a good thing. What’s crappy is the fact that:

  • it’s not FOSS
  • GE’s server is needlessly in the loop for everything
  • ppl must register on GE’s platform and give copious personal info which is then certain to be abused

To avoid both c/d and a/d, I would insist:

  • the app must be FOSS
  • the app and appliance both must have no cloud dependency and talk to each other in an off-grid LAN-only scenario
  • upgrades must be fetchable over Tor without registration, and side-loadable; users must be able to connect over Tor from a public cafe/library to fetch upgrades
7
57
bus stop (lemmy.sdf.org)
submitted 23 hours ago by pmjv to c/funhole
 
 
8
 
 

WM: Swayfx
Widgets: Eww
Code Editor: Neovim
Terminal: Foot
Font: Iosevka + Tagliner
Wallpapers: >https://github.com/szorfein/walls/tree/swayfx
Dots: https://github.com/szorfein/dotfiles

OC by @Szorfein@lemmy.ml

9
35
Slop slopping (lemmy.world)
submitted 23 hours ago by mcz@lemmy.world to c/funhole
 
 

AI users are among us! 😭 Learn to spot AI gernerated corntent with these 👉 simple tricks🤙:

✨ weird lines that don't make sense

✨ bad art that immitates good art

✨ impeccable spelling

✨ long dashes because it's literally impossible for a human to type them

✨ soulles eyes

✨ count the fingers − humans have between 3 and 4, sometimes 5

✨ is this factual? Brenda knows that phone bad and would never say or cook such a thing

🧨 AI watermark (be careful there are ways to remove it)

10
5
CSTMSHOP [GBA MinMod] (makertube.net)
submitted 18 hours ago by notptr to c/chiptunes
11
12
13
14
 
 

I often see people say that the majority of America is against Trump. How did he come to be democratically elected if the majority are against him? I know technically he didn't get the majority of votes, he got just under 50%, but if all the non-voters cared enough, they could have stopped him from becoming president. I know Kamala Harris wasn't the best choice either; I know it sucks that there are only two viable options in an election, but that's the way it is. You have to make the best of a bad situation and participate in the election to prevent the fascist takeover.

When I point out that the majority could have prevented this, I get told a lot of Americans didn't vote, as if that absolves them. That means the majority either voted for Trump or didn't care enough to prevent this. If the majority were against him and gave enough of a fuck about what happens to their country, they'd have voted to prevent this.

You don't get to refrain from participating and then say you aren't responsible for the outcome. Is this the reason so many university students refuse to study? They think if they don't study, it makes them not responsible for the outcome of the exam? When I was in university, I heard a lot of people complain that they weren't ready for the exam because they didn't study, seemingly oblivious that that was a choice they made. Now people tell me a lot of Americans didn't vote with that same attitude, as if CHOOSING not to vote was somehow beyond their control and not their responsibility

15
4
submitted 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) by evenwicht to c/iot
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/47171718

The guy could not use “Convection Roast” mode in his oven unless he connects to wi-fi and registers personal data. Apparently because this was a cook mode that was added after the oven was marketed.

Sure, it is useful to be able to get new features and upgrades after the thing is produced. But because of that, it’s as if they are making the store version deliberately excessively basic in order to twist people’s arms to run their proprietary closed-source spyware.

I was originally going to tag this as [a/d] (for asshole design), but opted to call it crappy design because upgradability is still a good thing. What’s crappy is the fact that:

  • it’s not FOSS
  • GE’s server is needlessly in the loop for everything
  • ppl must register on GE’s platform and give copious personal info which is then certain to be abused

To avoid both c/d and a/d, I would insist:

  • the app must be FOSS
  • the app and appliance both must have no cloud dependency and talk to each other in an off-grid LAN-only scenario
  • upgrades must be fetchable over Tor without registration, and side-loadable; users must be able to connect over Tor from a public cafe/library to fetch upgrades
16
17
18
 
 

Finishing is not an easy task

19
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/59456892

The linked article says nothing but good things about dishwashers with built-in grinders. So I’m skeptical.. it doesn’t give a balanced view.

Isn’t there a risk that small non-food objects end up getting smashed up? What happens when a small cocktail fork ends up in the drain? Wouldn’t that cause a disaster for the grinder?

Traditional dishwashers have the periodic user maintenance task of cleaning out the filter. I just wonder if the cure is worse than the disease by bringing in a grinder. It’s another thing to break.

20
82
submitted 1 day ago by pmjv to c/funhole
 
 
21
 
 
22
16
A cig (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 day ago by mcz@lemmy.world to c/funhole
 
 
23
 
 
24
2
gary_bussy (self.sudonyms)
submitted 1 day ago by wesker to c/sudonyms
25
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/47178832

Archived

[...]

Bankers and fund managers are now rushing to weigh the damage of what could become one of the biggest corporate restructurings in China’s history, involving over $50 billion of outstanding debt — including more than $7 billion held by lenders and bond investors overseas. They warn that Vanke’s worsening problems will send ripples throughout China’s economy and its financial system, threatening losses for banks and ramping up pressure on the long-struggling property sector.

[...]

The chaos at Vanke has an unmistakable sense of deja vu for investors who endured around $130 billion of defaults over the past four years, as the property crunch toppled almost all of China’s once high-flying developers. But while giants like China Evergrande Group had binged on debt and spent wildly, Vanke was considered safer — and better connected. Some investors even considered it too big to fail.

[...]

The warning signs had been building for years. In late 2024, a mid-level executive at a Chinese regional bank started to worry about his firm’s exposure to Vanke.

He noticed a simple problem: The property company had an asset-liability ratio of around 70%, meaning it had $100 to cover every $70 of debt. But real estate prices had been falling for years, with a gauge of second-hand home prices in Shenzhen down more than a third from its peak. How could banks be sure that Vanke’s assets would continue to be worth enough to cover its debts?

The banker, suspecting Vanke’s debt would soon run into trouble, submitted a proposal to his bosses to reclassify the company’s loans as non-performing. His plan was rejected. His bosses pointed out that other big banks weren’t calling the loans non-performing, and so there was no need to go against the grain.

State banks are sometimes group-thinking animals, he said. There was a logic behind his managers’ reluctance to act. At the time, it still seemed likely that Shenzhen Metro — and perhaps even the Shenzhen government — would be there to help.

[...]

Vanke’s roughly $160 billion of assets and more than 125,000 employees gave it a huge importance to Shenzhen, a bustling trade hub. The city’s busy skyline is dotted with Vanke developments, including packed residential blocks, towering office buildings and high-end shopping malls. The Vanke Centre, its sprawling headquarters, flanks the city’s beach getaway of Dameisha.

[...]

Around 45% of Vanke’s roughly $50 billion debt load is unsecured, according to Barclays research based on data to the end of June, making it particularly vulnerable if the company is forced to restructure. Some of Vanke’s loans are protected by a so-called letter of comfort — a vague attempt at reassurance that has questionable legal value.

[...]

The yearslong crisis is also fueling a rising sense of anxiety among Chinese officials, who are considering measures to turn around the property market including mortgage subsidies and tax rebates. On Thursday, policymakers said they would encourage more purchases of unsold homes.

Officials recently ordered two private data agencies to freeze the publication of home sales data. Shanghai authorities have censored posts that express a pessimistic outlook about the real estate sector. There is also a growing self-censorship: At a credit ratings conference in early December, speakers didn’t refer to Vanke by name — referring only to a debt extension by “a major developer.”

“The core issue with the property market is the glut of housing inventory and the severely dented confidence of homebuyers,” said Kelvin Lam, senior China economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics. “But the ongoing debt problems aren’t helping the situation, and suggest that the property sector is still very far away from being out of the woods.”

view more: next ›