Support for this instance is greatly appreciated at https://sdf.org/support

1
2234
2
2165
Never again (lemmy.world)
3
1973
4
1931
5
1765
6
1742
7
1701
8
1692

Those claiming AI training on copyrighted works is "theft" misunderstand key aspects of copyright law and AI technology. Copyright protects specific expressions of ideas, not the ideas themselves. When AI systems ingest copyrighted works, they're extracting general patterns and concepts - the "Bob Dylan-ness" or "Hemingway-ness" - not copying specific text or images.

This process is akin to how humans learn by reading widely and absorbing styles and techniques, rather than memorizing and reproducing exact passages. The AI discards the original text, keeping only abstract representations in "vector space". When generating new content, the AI isn't recreating copyrighted works, but producing new expressions inspired by the concepts it's learned.

This is fundamentally different from copying a book or song. It's more like the long-standing artistic tradition of being influenced by others' work. The law has always recognized that ideas themselves can't be owned - only particular expressions of them.

Moreover, there's precedent for this kind of use being considered "transformative" and thus fair use. The Google Books project, which scanned millions of books to create a searchable index, was ruled legal despite protests from authors and publishers. AI training is arguably even more transformative.

While it's understandable that creators feel uneasy about this new technology, labeling it "theft" is both legally and technically inaccurate. We may need new ways to support and compensate creators in the AI age, but that doesn't make the current use of copyrighted works for AI training illegal or unethical.

For those interested, this argument is nicely laid out by Damien Riehl in FLOSS Weekly episode 744. https://twit.tv/shows/floss-weekly/episodes/744

9
1676
Me but ublock origin (literature.cafe)
10
1671
11
1624
Earbuds (reddthat.com)

We used to have earbuds that don't need to be charged because they had a headphone jack, didn't get lost so easily because they had a cord attached to a headphone jack, never lost the bluetooth connection because they had a headphone jack, and they cost less because they had a headphone jack. https://bsky.app/profile/daisyfm.bsky.social/post/3l3mfjc6sn62k

12
1613
Say the line (lemmy.world)
13
1606
14
1598
15
1594
submitted 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by ModerateImprovement@sh.itjust.works to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

Mastodon Post.

Apk Link: https://cdn.organicmaps.app/apk/OrganicMaps-24081605-GooglePlay.apk

Note: If you don't want to deal with stuff like this, I recommend you download and use it from F-Droid client or Accrescent AppStore.

Update: The app returned to the App Store.

16
1591
17
1582
18
1581
Be careful. (feddit.org)
submitted 1 day ago by 101@feddit.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
19
1580
20
1573
We can't be friends. (64.media.tumblr.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by DougHolland@lemmy.world to c/aiop@lemmy.world
21
1567
22
1538
Launches (mander.xyz)
23
1536
submitted 3 weeks ago by Not_mikey@slrpnk.net to c/memes@lemmy.world
24
1534
Grok do a good (lemmy.ca)
25
1525
I hate these icons (gregtech.eu)
submitted 2 weeks ago by gregor@gregtech.eu to c/memes@lemmy.ml
view more: next ›

SDF Chatter

4,618 readers
190 users here now
founded 1 year ago
ADMINS
SDF