111
submitted 6 months ago by StrawberryPigtails to c/usa@lemmy.ml

Article may cause a stir, so to avoid a flame war here is the last line in the article.

She was not formally charged for living in the space, police said

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] StrawberryPigtails 4 points 6 months ago

I had to look this up. What a strange idea, but apparently it is a thing.

https://learn.eforms.com/real-estate/squatters-rights/#how-to-claim-squatters-rights

I knew about adverse possession but a squatter was just trespassing until that kicked in. Apparently I have to get them written notice and 30 days to get gone in my state.

I wonder why it doesn't decrease the number of rental home vacancies? Odd.

[-] MoonMelon@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's from the days when records were a lot harder to track down and someone could just die or disappear. After a certain amount of time the state just has to just call it or else the land's ownership is locked up forever. That's why the term of adverse possession is generally lower in the Western "frontier" states than the Eastern states, it was a lot more perilous to stake a claim there and there was a lot of turnover, with poor records. People have successfully adversely possessed abandoned houses in places like Vegas though, and more power to them.

It should be noted that trashing a house, setting fires, shitting in the corner, and inviting 30 of your friends to join you isn't the way this is done. You have to "openly and notoriously" occupy the property, which basically means presenting yourself as the owner. So you live there, keep the place up, and most importantly pay the property taxes. Basically present yourself in such a way that everyone thinks you are the owner.

this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
111 points (96.6% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7242 readers
99 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS