210
submitted 6 months ago by Martin@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

So my company decided to migrate office suite and email etc to Microsoft365. Whatever. But for 2FA login they decided to disable the option to choose "any authenticator" and force Microsoft Authenticator on the (private) phones of both employees and volunteers. Is there any valid reason why they would do this, like it's demonstrably safer? Or is this a battle I can pick to shield myself a little from MS?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jet@hackertalks.com 12 points 6 months ago

You can say no, and if they won't budge buy a cheap old phone off Swappa or craigslist or marketplace for $20 install Ms authenticstor on it and leave it at your desk.

[-] Juno@beehaw.org 1 points 5 months ago

What do you have against ms authenticator?

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It's proprietary closed source software, and if it's mandated to run on your device, it could be collecting a lot of telemetry that is not in your best interest.

It increases your security risk surface, more software to be made secure and update etc it's an extra burden

this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
210 points (94.1% liked)

Asklemmy

43992 readers
600 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS