1953
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago

The farther niche it goes, the less open it has to be, on principle of utility.

That's a great point! I kind of skipped over, that. Good add, thanks.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago

it's a rather weird concept, but it makes sense. If you want to standardize, let's say, threaded hardware across the continental US that you would inherently need to do away with any closed standards, assuming you want it to actually work, and along with that, whatever you settle on, needs to be open.

You could theoretically do this with closed source, but the problem here is that there will be someone that comes along and does it with open source, and if it's better, you're fucked. And if it's equal, and cheaper, you're fucked. And if it's marginally worse, but trivial to adopt, you're fucked.

this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
1953 points (98.1% liked)

Fediverse

28555 readers
505 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS