157
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 36 points 4 months ago

…and that’s the end of Halo.

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago

It died when it went from Bungie to 343 anyway

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

yuuuuUUup. both companies had a golden goose, bungie gave it away to pursue the glory that is, uh, destiny.... there's a wizard on the moon lol. ms decided to stick with the IP and start beating that horse to death post haste lol

[-] tb_@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

For all its flaws, Halo 4 did have some intrigue. Which they then completely abandoned for Halo 5's story. Which they then, again, completely abandoned for Infinite. It's just like the sequel trilogy!

It's such a mess.

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I just hated the introduction of a new enemy. The Prometheans sucked, and so did their weapons. 343 clearly did that so they could put their own stamp on it. The new weapons sucked for the most part. They also Call of dutied up a bunch of parts of the multiplayer which was lame.

[-] Zahille7@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago

It was the end of Halo when it went live service imo.

[-] sploosh@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Well, they called it live service, but did they ever really deliver?

[-] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 months ago

Agreed. F2P multiplayer and paid campaign rubbed me the wrong way. Just wasn’t the halo I grew up with.

[-] aluminium@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

no, 343 making halo was the end

[-] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Infinite was when they gave up. No story, lazy maps, broken online, barebones multiplayer. My personal grievance is abandoning the Promethean storyline and Cortana's story. Bringing her back was a mistake. But they should have followed through once they did it.

[-] Zahille7@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

If they had stuck with anything they started, it would've turned out exponentially better.

This wishy-washy "restarting the story" each new game was actually exhausting.

[-] PenisWenisGenius@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

These days it's like rpgs and first person shooters just evolved into the same genre. The boomer shooter isn't dead, it just lives on as a game mechanic that plays a part in larger games. Remember that turn based shit in kotor? This was before putting first or third person combat in every game was normalized and it sucked. Imagine if Skyrim had turn based combat instead of direct control real-time combat, no one would still be playing it. I'd be willing to play a halo starfield like rpg maybe but they'd probably enshittify it too much so never mind.

this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
157 points (98.8% liked)

Games

16834 readers
964 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS