233
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
233 points (95.7% liked)
politics
19148 readers
2132 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Used a racial slur a decade ago?
I'd bet my life savings that he used a racial slur this morning if it weren't for the fact there's no way his fat ass is up at 7:30 a.m. on a Tuesday.
Yeah…… for the people that will vote for Trump “used a slur in the 90s” isn’t the grand reveal they think it is.
Telling his nephew he should let his developmentally disabled son die... classic Trump.
I'm sorry to tell you this friend... A decade ago was 2014
Older people tend to wake up earlier, and he is really fucking old. Isn't it weird his old ass is running for president?
I understand he's the oldest presidential nominee, EVER!
There should be age limits! 70 or 75 at the oldest!
Ridiculous that a guy that old can be president! Bill Clinton was president 25 years ago, and is still younger!!
While I do think there are people who could be great presidents into their 80s mentally, the stresses of the job and how rapidly things change does lend itself to a need for an age cap.
No more than 70 as of the day they would take office sounds good to me as they would leave before their 75th birthday plus it is double the minimum of 35 do it would be easy to remember!
The same could be apllied to the chain of succession. If over 70 on the day they would be swirn in it passes to the next person.
We need to get back to the idea of people retiring. no one should be able to run for or be appointed office if over age 60 and if their term would go beyond 65 then the term is shortened to the year of the their 65th an election is held for the office (or new appointment)
Even though I think 60 is a good age for people to be able to retire, I also think that 60 is low for forced retirement.
Im not saying they have to retire from any kind of work. Just can't run for a new term of office.
Waking up early is like the one thing he does. His bowels get him up at 4:30 and he diarrheas hamberders down the toilet while rage tweeting for like 2 hours. I bet some of his calls to the early morning fox couch show were done from the porcelain throne.