132

I think we all owe The Marvels an apology...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ryan213@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 month ago

That's surprising. First one was good.

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

First one was depressing. Awfully depressing. It was poignant and well done but I can't rewatch it because I have to gear up to be ready for it.

The second one is a musical. I'm not sure anyone is ready for that after the first one.

[-] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

It's weird. I watch the first Joker like three times so far. Haven't seen the second. Now, Requiem for a Dream, that's a hard watch for me.

[-] lobut@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago

I put Requiem in the category movies of "Best Films I'll Never See Again". "The Skin I Live In" is in there too.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Add Grave of the Fireflies to that list

[-] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

Requiem is presented well, but I can't get past the unrealistic situations they put the characters through, especially near the end.

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

They both are depressing as fuck. Add in Blow too.

[-] Lemming6969@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

First film was a great film if it were new IP, but a shit joker batman film. The second film was always likely to be shit, because they were always going for abstract and avant garde artistry without a clear connection to the underlying and far stronger story and IP people are expecting. I'm sure it's a beautiful film and musical, but it's dog shit attached to joker.

[-] ryan213@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 month ago

I didn't even view the first as anything related to Batman. Just a standalone movie to me.

[-] keyez@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

That's what it was supposed to be, a gritty disconnected story about what a more realistic take on a joker would be, don't think batman or super heroes was supposed to be in either one, not sure where that commenter is coming from.

[-] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 5 points 1 month ago

There is Bruce Wayne in the first one. He is the rich guy the main character meets in the public toilets then go stalk at his house.

[-] Infernal_pizza@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

That’s Thomas Wayne, Bruce is the kid he’s playing with at the gate

[-] CaliforniaSober@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

But that’s not the point.

Batman is a presence. The Wayne’s as a story element, they are supposed to be moral & ethical pillars. Solid truth. Batman does not kill and preserves an ethical truth.

All while the joker is a shifting description… an unreliable narrator. not a pillar not anything solid or true. The villains can shift and don’t have to hold true to anything. The killing joke is all about the lie and shifting excuses…

The movie may suck but a shifty joker hasn’t traditionally been the reason.

[-] keyez@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Bruce and Thomas Wayne were in the movies yes, they are part of that universe but it is not a superhero batman film or in that universe which is what I had mentioned

[-] lobut@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

I think a lot of the Batman connections were completely unnecessary and felt jarring. There weren't that many and they were brief but I just wish they weren't there at all. It's a great film flaws and all to me.

[-] SurfinBird@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago
[-] keyez@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

There are a handful of singing renditions and dressed up numbers with the two main actors.

[-] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago
[-] keyez@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

They had Lady Gaga in the movie and gotta use her talents, a couple of the numbers were good and made sense, some were forced and unnecessary.

[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

Because the staircase scene in the first one was popular. So quadruple down!

[-] koberulz@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

There were people suggesting given the age of Bruce Wayne in Joker, that the Phoenix character probably wasn't The Joker, merely an inspiration for him. Harley showing up in the sequel would seem to refute this theory.

this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
132 points (95.2% liked)

Movies

7513 readers
108 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.

!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW's home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS