259
Permanently Deleted
(www.thedailybeast.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
259 points (94.5% liked)
Not The Onion
12540 readers
465 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
A big enough laser pointed at the ocean would probably get a hurricane started; just gotta get enough moisture and heat into the air.
Now, powering the thing would be tricky, and doing it all unnoticed...
https://www.reuters.com/markets/deals/constellation-inks-power-supply-deal-with-microsoft-2024-09-20/
I like the way you think, but I don't think Three Mile's remaining reactor has the output you'd need.
Actually, I wonder what the wattage of an average hurricane is. Somebody has to have done the math, probably Randall.
yeah, to be real, I'm not convinced our total global generated power would even be on the same order of magnitude.
I was thinking tera or exa watt output would be needed, which is less than our global energy consumption, but hilariously more than any individual power plant could produce, regardless of whether it's fission, fusion, natural gas, or coal.
An antimatter powered generator might be able to hit the mark, but good luck with that; both building an antimatter power plant, and creating enough antimatter in the first place