413
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

Yes, they're designed to seem that way.

Which is why I earlier stated that my issue wasn't with listing them, but specifically, the way you presented them.

I've also not presented my beliefs

You used the word "murdering" to describe a transgender woman playing sports with other women, despite her playing at a level comparable to them.

You absolutely presented your beliefs.

[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

You used the word "murdering" to describe a transgender woman playing sports with other women, despite her playing at a level comparable to them.

Oh come off it. Watch the video, she's a damn head taller than almost everyone she's playing against and God knows how many ppunds heavier.

If we don't want to be the crazy side we have to come to terms with arguments about issues, even important ones, not being only good or evil.

[-] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago

I went through the numbers to highlight her performance is on par with the rest of her team, and you still think that I'm being unreasonable

As I said, you presented your position quite clearly, which is why I called you out

[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don't think you're unreasonable, you have more context than myself and any other casual North American sports fan who (shockingly!) hasn't learned the points per game rates of Aussie rules footie. BUT, for most who have a casual understanding of sports, seeing someone a foot taller than their competition makes us go "huh, that seems wild."

As we do when reading one of the most reputable papers in the world raising concerns about transgender health science methodology.

(For what it's worth, in my personal experience of playing mid level co-ed rec league sports in a large liberal city for awhile, I've played against a few teams, mostly their trans player was the best woman on their team and by not a small margin. We don't give a shit because, like I said, mid level co-ed rec league sports.)

The fact you feel compelled to "call out" someone trying to sincerely answer a reasonable question kinda speaks volumes.

[-] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

someone trying to sincerely answer a reasonable question

Yeah, that's why you linked to transphobic hit pieces and described trans women in sports with hugely emotionally loaded terms

Because you're reasonable

As I said from the beginning, your comment was fine unti you let some of your more transphobic opinions out in the final paragraph. That paragraph was not "reasonable"

[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If you're at the point where you're calling articles in ond of the most reputable papers on Earth "transphobic hit pieces", you need go re-evaluate.

Edit: there's a reason trump always screams about the crooked media for their crime of factual reporting.

this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
413 points (89.8% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35870 readers
616 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS