66
Ethics Chair Removes Committee from Gaetz Investigation
(www.mississippifreepress.org)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
66 points (98.5% liked)
politics
19188 readers
2360 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
What?
Where have you heard that?
They cooperated against his conspirator, they've had civil suits...
I kind of pay attention to news, so I'd be surprised if I missed something about the victims (no idea why you said witnesses) stopped cooperating for a brief window and Garland immediately dropped charges.
Because man, even if that happened, it still makes no sense to close the case early.
Hey. Maybe I missed something though, I tried to find a source though, and if anything is out there I'm still missing it.
So, can you help me out and provide a source for this:
One thing you can always count on in cases like this is that people online will find a way to blame the women...
He was my Congressman, so I've followed the case. Have you?
"bUT tHe GURRLL!"
As I said, she wouldn't talk at the time the case was dropped, but has since. Also, his scummy friend was expected to throw him under the bus after his conviction. Did not.
Get off your high horse Mr. White Knight.
I have, actually, and until you brought it up I had never heard that any witness were refusing to talk.
When the DOJ closed the case on Gaetz, it was widely reported that a "concern about witness credibility" was the reason why charges weren't filled, but that story was never confirmed by the DOJ (they still haven't commented, afaik) and instead was coming from "individuals who had been in contact with the DOJ". I think it's pretty safe to assume those individuals were Gaetz' layers, so... yeah, best to take that story with a huge grain of salt. And anyway, that isn't the same as a victim refusing to cooperate.
Now last week the lawyer of one of Gaetz' victims has publicly acknowledged that his client did not what to testify at trial against Gaetz (which is pretty reasonable considering how MAGAts react to women accusing people in Trump's orbit), but that's still not the same as refusing to cooperate with the DOJ, and isn't any reason to pin blame on the victim.
The "witnesses wouldn't talk" part was from before current events, couple of years ago. That is why they dropped the case at that time.
Now the woman has testified, but she would not previously, and neither would his scummy friend, even after get thrown in the slammer.
Well. None of that is true either...