433
Know the difference (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com

ACAB, especially that bastard relative of yours.

The capitalist state and it's forces in the form of Police and Military primarily exist to protect the private property of the rich. All other functions are secondary.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] chaogomu@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

If you have $40 to your name, the cops are just much more likely to beat you and take it, than they are to protect you from someone else taking it.

Cops don't actually spend much time on solving crimes, they mostly spend their time ticketing and harassing the poor in favor of the rich.

[-] atomicfox@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Much more likely? What country are you talking about? Assuming we are talking about the United States, this is just not true.

The police are not that cartoonishly evil like most posters here seem to think they are.

[-] chaogomu@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Let me introduce you to asset forfeiture, which is a thing cops do to steal from people by claiming that the property or money was guilty of a crime. The owner isn't actually allowed to argue in defense of their stuff, because the owner isn't on trial, their stuff is.

If you're poor and a minority, you have it much worse.

A quote from that last one;

Police seized as little as $25 in cash, a cologne gift set worth $20 and crutches.


Now, contrast that to this little article that says police solve about 2% of all major crime, and you see the reality of American policing.

They rob the poor and then ignore crime in favor of harassing the poor a bit more. So yes, if you only have $40 to your name, cops will not protect your money, they're more likely to take it from you.

[-] atomicfox@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

I'm aware of what civil forfeiture is.

I read the techdirt article you linked, but it doesn't state how many people were affected, what percentage of people the police interacted with had money or items taken from them, or any data that supports your claim that police are "much more likely to beat you and take it". Moreover, the article did not mention any of the victims being physically beaten by the police before being robbed.

To be clear, I do not support civil forfeiture or the police stealing from anyone. I am just not convinced that a person is significantly more likely to be beaten and robbed by the police.

[-] chaogomu@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I said that cops are more likely to beat you and take your money than they are to protect you from someone else taking it.

That context is important. Don't try to strip it away.

As to backing that statement up, it's easy, It's the combination of article A and article B.

Or rather the Reason article that plots out the tens of thousands of times cops stole from poor people in Chicago in a 5-year period versus the 2% of major crimes that cops solve yearly.

Which make the statement, "much more likely to rob you themselves than save you from being robbed" true.

Because saving people from criminals isn't their real job. No, their real job is enforcing the status quo of rich and poor, and keeping the poor nice and oppressed.

[-] ggleblanc@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Which make[s] the statement, "much more likely to rob you themselves than save you from being robbed" true.

In Chicago, sure. What are the statistics for Lafayette, Illinois? Harvel, Illinois? Kell, Illinois? I could go on, but astute readers already get my point.

[-] chaogomu@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Astute readers know that you're mindlessly pro-police. They also know that the police will never return the favor. Because we all live in the real world, not your thin blue line magic world where the police don't go out of their way to harass the poor and minorities.

[-] atomicfox@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

Solving a crime and protecting someone from being robbed are not the same thing.

[-] chaogomu@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

And yet, you have stories like this.

Note that cops are not required to protect anyone. They can and do, just fuck off when you need help. Because there's no legal requirement for them to do anything else. Some few might step in, but only to boost their arrest records.

[-] Alto@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

You can just say you've never lived outside upper-middle class suburbia, it's ok

this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
433 points (87.0% liked)

Lefty Memes

4413 readers
161 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS