this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
365 points (92.5% liked)

Fuck AI

3497 readers
365 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] glimse@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You were supposed to argue with fervor, not make stuff up..

You're wrong, they both use LLMs.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Any research using LLM, not on it, is publishing bullshit.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why double down on being wrong? My two examples aren't publishing bullshit.

If OP was only talking about chatgpt and the like, maybe they should have said that instead of lumping all LLMs together??

Either way I think we're done here, a shame you never actually argued with fervor

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Fine then:

  1. IBM - Not an LLM

  2. Meta Open Catalyst - Not an LLM

In fact the Open Catalyst in the paper specifically compares it's model to LLMs in that both different models improved with larger datasets (and increased processing power).

Eat shit

[–] glimse@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago
  1. IBM DeepSearch. But you're half right, the drug I was thinking of was BenevolentAI...using an LLM similar to IBM.

  2. CatBERTa

But nice try. Eat shit, I guess