this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
13 points (78.3% liked)

science

203 readers
1 users here now

Discuss the latest science news, original research papers, and connect with fellow enthusiasts.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Dubious article that misrepresents the study it references, and even relies on 'social media posts' for certain claims. What a joke.

[–] G4Z@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

I just thought it was important to post because nobody is really talking about it, sorry if I've posted misinformation.

I read the study you posted, still sounds bad but doesn't seem to mention current reversal at all.

Also your study seems to be by 'A.S., R.C., E.O., V.G.-G., A.T., and A.C.N.G. designed research; A.S., A.N., E.O., V.G.-G., R.S., M.R.M., T.S., and F.A.H. performed research; A.S., E.O., and V.G.-G. analyzed data; and A.S. wrote the paper with contributions from all co-authors.'

the article references Spanish marine scientists at 'El Institut de Ciències del Mar'.

Just wondering if you've posted the right one?

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That was posted June 30 and the article says the study in question was posted July 2, so I think it is a different one.

[–] yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

My guess is that, whoever wrote the article on intellinews (the author isn't mentioned by name, red flag #1), was referencing the date they saw a related social media post, which prompted them to create this alarmist bullshit for ad revenue.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)