this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
11 points (100.0% liked)

technology

24373 readers
163 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MattEagle@hexbear.net 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That doesn't really seem to line up with the reality of their new US energy dependence and consolidation of the EU apparatus. I suspect any notion of a break within the imperial bloc is political theatre to placate the citizenry.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Energy dependence was not Europe's choice.

[–] darkcalling@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yet it is their reality. And it sort of is.

Nothing but lack of sovereignty is stopping them from dropping support for Ukraine tomorrow, making up with Russia and starting up the cheap energy flows from the east via tanker ships while working on building some new pipe-lines with US military proximity detection alarms on them.

They are constrained by their liberalism and the limits of its imagination. Liberalism which is largely filtered through Atlantacist, UK, or US lens via media, press, etc.

So I think I'm also quite skeptical of this being anything but an attempt to act up, gain leverage and better terms from master America.

[–] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The irony of ridiculing them for liberalness while suggesting they cozy up to imperialist Russia, who is actively waging a war of conquest in their own backyard. That's the type of shit I usually hear right before someone insists Russia had NO CHOICE but to attack their neighbors because all their neighbors are joining defensive alliances when they see how Russia abuses their neighbors.

[–] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

defensive alliances

if you mean NATO, maybe check up on their history https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NATO_operations

Nazi Aligned Terrorist Organization

Adolf Heusinger: As a top Nazi officer, Heusinger served as acting Chief of Staff of the Army for Nazi Germany, helping plan invasions of Poland, Denmark, Norway, and Austria. He was later appointed Inspector General of the West German Armed Forces and became Chairman of the NATO Military Committee in Washington D.C.

Hans Speidel: A Nazi lieutenant general and chief of staff to Erwin Rommel, Speidel became Supreme Commander of NATO Allied Ground Forces in Central Europe (1957–1963).

Johannes Steinhoff: A former Luftwaffe top fighter ace who became Chairman of the NATO Military Committee from 1971 to 1974.

Reinhard Gehlen: A Nazi intelligence officer who helped construct a German foreign secret service with U.S. assistance, which later influenced the creation of the BND

Ferdinand von Senger und Etterlin: Lieutenant in the Nazi invasion of the USSR (Operation Barbarossa). He participated in the Battle of Stalingrad. He was awarded the German Cross in Gold. At the end of the war he was a deputy High Command personnel of the Third Reich Navy. He later commanded several tank battalions and became a general and commander-in-chief of NATO’s Allied Forces Central Europe between 1979 and 1983.

Franz Joseph Schulze: Lieutenant in the service of the Nazi air forces as commander of a regiment. He received the Knight’s Cross of the Iron Cross. In post-war Germany he was a general and later commander-in-chief of NATO’s Central European Allied Forces from 1977 to 1979.

Karl Schnell: Major and first officer of the General Staff in Nazi Germany, also received the Iron Cross. He replaced General Ferber as Commander-in-Chief of NATO’s Allied Forces Central Europe between 1975 and 1977.

Ernst Ferber: Lieutenant colonel in the Wehrmacht General Staff, decorated with the Iron Cross. He became Commander-in-Chief of NATO’s Central European Allied Forces between 1973 and 1975.

Johann von Kielmansegg: General Cabinet Officer of the Nazi Army High Command, where he rose to Colonel and commanded several regiments in the field. After the war he joined the German Army and rose to Brigadier General and rose to the highest positions in NATO as Commander-in-Chief of Special Forces in Central Europe in 1967.

[–] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yeah, unfortunately, if you convince a bunch on imperialists to band together, even if for a benign reason like defense, they will realize that they can collaborate on doing imperialist shit from time to time. It still doesn't change the fact that the biggest reason eastern European states make an effort to join NATO, especially those formerly in the Soviet bloc, is for defensive assurances, typically assurances against Russia.

Sometimes, the enemy of my enemy isn't my friend. It's just another asshole bickering with the first asshole.

[–] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Russia is providing humanitarian aid to Cuba (that is being starved by your US) and helping to repel European colonizers in Africa, e.g. the Sahel. Yeah, Russia isn't the USSR but one can realize who is the lesser evil in the Global South's eyes.

[–] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I could list humanitarian aid the US has delivered, too, almost certainly at times at odds with Russian cruelty, but I don't really want to go there because I don't see it as a meaningful distinction because I primarily see the difference between the US and Russia as one of capacity, not ethics. If Russia had the power and position the US has, I don't think they'd act any better. They're no less evil; they just have less capacity to enact evil. That's why I can understand a desire to distance oneself from the US and can even understand how Russia could be perceived as an ally, but I don't think they're a genuine ally. They'll help to the extent it furthers their own goals, and they'll turn on you as soon as that furthers their goals.

[–] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They’ll help to the extent it furthers their own goals, and they’ll turn on you as soon as that furthers their goals.

You see, while hypocrite liberals feign reproach, the Global South understands that. You can live with Israel as an ally, others will grab any helping hand available because they don't have the luxury to refuse. While THE UNITED STATES represent an EXISTENTIAL THREAT to the entire world, there's no other way.

Whether Russia gets on that level or not, that's a consideration for another day.

[–] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can live with Israel as an ally

Don't assume I approve of that even a little bit.

Whether Russia gets on that level or not, that's a consideration for another day.

Maybe you're right. Maybe I'm overly pessimistic about it. But I just don't think it'll pan out the way you hope. I don't see dependence on Russia panning out well for more than just a little while. Maybe it's worth a moment's respite, but I worry it only perpetuates the cycle, not breaks it.

[–] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don’t assume I approve of that even a little bit.

What are you doing against it?

[–] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What the fuck do you want, man? I'm working all the hours I can just to still not make enough to cover my bills. I barely have any time or money for myself. I try to join events, and I try to volunteer a little time here and there to contribute to things, but I can't champion every cause even if I recognize it's one worth fighting for. Just because I don't meet whatever arbitrary minimum standard you want to set doesn't mean I don't care, and it doesn't mean I don't try to help make things better.

[–] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The cold truth is that no usian really cares, they're too busy scrolling smartphones and eating bad food to stop supporting either reds or blues to do the same fucking thing in the office. No real change will come from the extremely racialized and racist, too individualist, US society.

[–] InexplicableLunchFiend@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

it's telling that you have to come up with idealist hypotheticals of why Russia could be bad if they were like the US. Instead of just, looking at and describing reality where the USA is the fascist empire rampaging across the planet with 800 foreign military bases while Russia has 0.

You have been trained your whole life by the Liberal hegemonic worldview that was instilled as you in education and through media to immediately begin Rationalizing everything, digesting it into a soup where you are the good guy and those who oppose you are the bad guys. Every single geopolitical and historical fact you have ever encountered and discussed with others has been filtered through this Liberal Idealist Rationalizing process, where you break it down and come up with some hypotheticals or twist it through some contortions and what-ifs and allegories and metaphors until it comes out what you want it to.

Stop doing that. Just look at hard facts. Use materialism and empiricism. Stop being a fucking debate nerd who needs to turn everything into gotchas and rhetorical fallacies. It's not only tiring to those who engage with you and makes you insufferable, it also makes it so you have no fucking idea what is actually happening on Earth and will consistently be wrong. Ever wonder why the "tankies" are always right, about opposing American Wars while you squishy idealist lefties are consistently incorrect and fall for it over and over? Why does your tendency always believe in every American imperialist project like Ukraine, Israel, Syria until it's over or in serious decline and finally removes its mask? Maybe just try listening to the people who were right the whole time and continue to be right, and find out how it is they're doing it (it's materialist marxist analysis).

[–] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago

It’s not "doing imperialist shit" from time to time as you say. It’s imperialist as a foundational aspect. Its goal is to secure US imperialist world order. It’s as defensive as Israel’s existence. Defense against "the enemy" (which goes back and forth between Russia and China these days) is pure consent manufacturing.

Sometimes, the enemy of my enemy isn't my friend. It's just another asshole bickering with the first asshole.

To address this, sure. The way that maga people are also against democrats. But this situation is not that. Aligning with the US only serves the US imperialist order and MIC capitalists. US wields the largest military force in the world, 800+ bases on every continent, all major financial institutions. Russia and China do not. Dismantling this order is of utmost importance for the liberation of people worldwide. This is why alignement away from US and towards global south is crucial for Europes future.

[–] InexplicableLunchFiend@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If you think NATO is for defense you have some serious brain de-worming to do. You know the genocidal warmongers who kill millions have little interest in “defense”. Stop playing dumb. NATO is interchangeable with the USA, and the USA is the most fascist nation on Earth currently (alongside Israel and Ukraine, which it put into place and uses as proxies). Wake the fuck up dude you live in the Death Star.

[–] InexplicableLunchFiend@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

A perfect example of a Liberal with no imagination, if anyone wanted to see it. Stuck in the ruts of your propaganda and ideology, you just can't help but doing the same thing over and over which is why you will never escape daddy America's orbit.

[–] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'll freely admit the US is on some grade A bullshit. I'll also freely admit it's the inevitable end result of centuries of behavior. But cozy up to modern Russia instead? I could understand the idea if they were still the USSR, but that's not what they've been for decades. Just because you're distancing yourself from one abusive asshole doesn't mean you run straight into the arms of another abusive asshole.

[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Europe should've cozied up with China if they feel like cozying up with Russia is politically untenable and geopolitically unsound. But Europe and Europeans are far too Sinophobic, so they can look forward to further vassaldom by the US.

[–] InexplicableLunchFiend@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

China cannot provide energy to Europe in the short term. Europe has to get that either from the USA, from Russia or from the Middle East (or some combination of the 3)

Since the imperialists have disabled all the Russian pipelines into Europe, and pretty permanently burned the bridges of their relations with Russia now Russia is pretty much off the table for a few decades at least. Plus their capacity is all going to China now anyway, and their oil and gas infrastructure is also being harried by Ukrainian attacks on Russian tankers, depots and refineries. They've layered so many sanctions onto Russia it will basically be legally impossible to unwind it, they've dug themselves a hole.

The Middle East is now off the table, since Europe stood by and watched a genocide for 3 years build into a massive regional war and let America escalate the war that then wiped out all of it in the short to medium term. For 5 years at least (even if the war ended and the strait opened today) the Middle East will be unable to provide any significant amount of energy to the EU. They could have intensely pressured the US and Israel to reel it in at any point since October 2023, but instead they have done the opposite, giving them diplomatic cover and military logistical assistance and censoring and brutalizing their own populations on behalf of Zionism.

So the EU had a chance where they could be independent, but they blew it. It's probably too late now. They are now slaves to the USA energy markets for the medium term future at least - and yes, it is entirely the fault of European leadership and their myopic ideological view that allows the US to easily corner them and force them into whatever position it wants. If they had been less sinophobic, less russophobic, less zionist and pushed back more against the USA to guarantee Minsk 1 & 2 and the JCPOA then none of this would be happening, but everytime Israel/the USA commit barbarous and perfidious acts, they are always there to cover for them and side with them reflexively.

[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago

If they had been less sinophobic, less russophobic, less zionist and pushed back more against the USA to guarantee Minsk 1 & 2 and the JCPOA then none of this would be happening, but everytime Israel/the USA commit barbarous and perfidious acts, they are always there to cover for them and side with them reflexively.

There is no conceivable geopolitical benefit for the EU to entertain notions of Taiwanese separatism or any other anti-Chinese talking point like the US. Absolutely nobody in Taiwan thinks the EU will help them, and I seriously doubt your average Euro could tell Asians apart anyways. They don't even lost out that much relative to the US once China becomes a hegemonic power. At least Australia gets the excuse that they're geographically close to China when the EU doesn't even have that.

But apparently the European brainpan can do nothing but seethe that they are being eclipsed by Asian countries they still think inferior despite being Asians themselves. The thought of being Asian is so revolting that they would rather larp as living on some fake continent and be pushed around by a bunch of even faker settler-colonial societies.

[–] InexplicableLunchFiend@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

sad to see how myopic you are and blinded by propaganda. maybe you should wonder why is "abusive imperialist modern russia" running the American oil embargo of Cuba to deliver humanitarian aid in the form of energy, the only one on Earth to do it? Why are they allying themselves closely to the DPRK and China? Why are they helping decolonize Africa and destroy the French and US backed terrorist groups? Why did they help stabilize Syria for so long and prevent it falling into Zionist Al Qaeda control much earlier?

You can answer 'they don't have good intentions, it's just in their interest to align against the imperialists and with their victims". OK, I don't care. Russia fights on my side, meanwhile westerners never have not even the 'leftists'.

If you learned a bit more about the Ukraine war you would realize they are right there as well. Ukraine was overtaken by a CIA backed Nazi coup in 2014 and was built up by NATO to invade and balkanize Russia, starting by cleansing all the ethnic Russians in the Donbas regions. Tens of thousands dead by Nazi hands before Russia intervened. If anything Putin is too soft and too late, he should have hardened his heart earlier and done what was needed before it could fester and entrench itself to the extent it did but he kept getting strung along by the fake Minsk agreements (which Merkel later openly admitted were done in bad faith and perfidiously to buy time to arm Ukrainian nazis)

[–] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If anything Putin is too soft and too late, he should have hardened his heart earlier and done what was needed before it could fester and entrench itself to the extent it did but he kept getting strung along by the fake Minsk agreements

Liberals who view Putin as an aggressive tyrant are just like the conservatives who viewed Obama as a radical socialist.

Obama was terrified of being perceived as a radical leftist and was constantly compromising and capitulating to the right in order to prove that he wasn't one. It didn't make a difference, because the right wing's boogeyman caricature of him was impervious to facts and reality.

Similarly, Putin has constantly brushed off provocations and sought to compromise with the West (to a foolish degree even), but his actions have no effect on his portrayal, because the NATO media cinematic universe needs a villain.

[–] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You can answer 'they don't have good intentions, it's just in their interest to align against the imperialists and with their victims". OK, I don't care. Russia fights on my side, meanwhile westerners never have not even the 'leftists'.

I'm going to focus here because I think this is the real crux of our disagreement. I don't see Russia as fighting for you. I see them as fighting over you. This is why I see siding with Russia as little more than trading one master for the other. It will feel amazing to overthrow the current masters, but then what? How long will that elation last when Russia starts tightening their grip?

[–] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago

Russia, unlike the West, supports liberation movements in the Global South

[–] hello_hello@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you learned a bit more about the Ukraine war you would realize they are right there as well. Ukraine was overtaken by a CIA backed Nazi coup in 2014 and was built up by NATO to invade and balkanize Russia, starting by cleansing all the ethnic Russians in the Donbas regions. Tens of thousands dead by Nazi hands before Russia intervened. If anything Putin is too soft and too late, he should have hardened his heart earlier and done what was needed before it could fester and entrench itself to the extent it did but he kept getting strung along by the fake Minsk agreements (which Merkel later openly admitted were done in bad faith and perfidiously to buy time to arm Ukrainian nazis)

Isnt it weird how you ignored this and focused on doing word salad? It's almost like you have no actual material argument and are focusing on waxing poetic over something that hasn't happened.

The crux is not in your wet dreams of evil "Ruzzian" backstabbing the crux is in what's happening in real life.

[–] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I ignored it because the last several times I engaged in good faith, there was never really much evidence of what they claim. Like I've seen the same 4-5 pictures of Ukrainians with Nazi symbols, including some groups of like a couple dozen, and it's obviously problematic, but they claim it's systemic and provide anecdotal evidence. There's never anything concrete, so it goes nowhere in the end, and the core point that just because they're right to move away from the US doesn't mean it's a good idea to move toward Russia, gets lost. We can argue shades of who's worse, and maybe you're technically right, but I think that largely comes down to opportunity. The US has the capacity to get away with more shit, so they do more shit. If you diminish the US by building up Russia, Russia will likewise gain the capacity to get away with more shit and do more shit. I get the anger, but I think people get so upset with the US, they mistake their enemy's enemy for a friend instead of just two of their enemies fighting over who gets to own them.

[–] hello_hello@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNZwLA869Sc

Ukrainian-created documentary translated into English. Also look up the Odessa Trade Union Massacre

Modern Ukraine is an undead slave state. Undead as in even if all Ukrainian soldiers became unkillable supermen, the population demographics of the nation and the privatization from US imperialist entities like Blackrock will doom any potential recovery of Ukraine that gives autonomy to Ukrainian people. The people who have fled will not come back (the smart ones are in Russia as they will avoid the blowback that goes westward) and the people who have stayed are not enough to build back due to the draft and the destroyed infrastructure.

Slave as in, even with all this, the Kiev government will not entertain any form of negotiations. Instead, "Bussification" has emerged as Ukrainian men, no matter if they are unfit, are kidnapped by the state and forced into the front lines. This is not a democratic choice considering zelensky's refusal to hold elections (which even Putin is capable of doing). It was the choice of the imperial core to force Ukraine to sacrifice its own existence for nothing in return. Americans are willing to fight to the last Ukrainian after all.

In comparison, Russians volunteer and you can live your life in Russia without it being centered on the war. Besides the sanctions turning off western social media, life stays the same. Putin is still overwhelmingly popular and there is no real opposition party. You can be a shitlib, a trans anarchist or a orthodox conservative and the domestic social dynamics have not changed due to the war. But in Ukraine, anyone who is not trusted is labeled a separatist with droves of ready brown shirts willing to force you to submit. Even speaking Russian is anti-Ukrainian even though most of the population can speak both languages.

Russia has a right to defend itself and its people. Ukraine has never had a choice.

[–] InexplicableLunchFiend@hexbear.net 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

5 pictures? Try 500,000, every single picture coming out of Ukraine has them. Even with the complicit Western press censoring and hiding them, half of the photos in their articles still show nazi-aligned symbols. They often take down their stories and photos when this is pointed out and put up new ones. Why does this keep happening even with the media that is in their corner?

Before 2022 there were hundreds of articles in the Western media about Ukraine's Nazi problem, how systematic their infiltration into the Maidan government was. Then after the invasion in 2022, they were all memory-holed and deleted. You can only find them in archives now.

Ukraine is the most corrupt nation in Europe, with the most human trafficking - predominantly done by government connected Nazi gangs.

Ukraine is Zionist and a close ally of fascist Israel. Zelenskyy has stated his goal is "to become the Israel of Europe". This alone is adequate justification for destroying their state to prevent this from forming. They vote in the UN alongside Israel and the US for genocide, and they vote in the UN against condemning Nazism.

Nothing systemic about the Nazi government? Are you aware of who runs the interior ministry, the SBD and Ukrainian police since 2014? All outright swastika tatted neo-Nazis, many of them jailed for murder, trafficking or corruption before 2014 and then released. Over 20 neo-Nazi organizations and militias have been absorbed into the official military, their leaders all promoted to positions of command and they are allowed to keep their Nazi insignia. They name streets after Bandera and other fascists who fought alongside the Nazis, and openly proclaim them as official state heroes. They run Nazi youth training camps for children where they heil Hitler and Bandera. They released Tornado units from jail who were imprisoned for sexual assault and murder to use as fighters. It was Nazi snipers who instigated the 2014 coup and Nazi militants who burned down the Trade Hall in Odessa, slaughtering the trade unionists inside. neither of which were punished by the new Nazi state installed by the CIA. Want me to keep going? What will convince you, do you need them to have swastikas on their foreheads or what? Do you want lists of names and nazi orgs? I can provide walls of text.

There has never been a more Nazi nation in existence except the original Nazis. They are not hiding it you just refuse to see.

[–] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh hey, look, exactly what I said happens every time, a whole bunch of claims with zero evidence at all.

[–] InexplicableLunchFiend@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's called making an argument using facts. As opposed to you, who makes no claims whatsoever and only waxed poetically about idealism without any connection to actual events. At least I'm talking about planet earth. Do you want wall of texts of links? Is that what would make you happy? You would come up with some other deflection and not look at them after I spend a couple hours aggregating them anyway, which is why I generally haven't bothered, because Liberal like you don't generally read or care.

[–] InexplicableLunchFiend@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yes Europe chose it when they chose belligerence and war, they chose to sit idly by as Trump invaded Venezuela, attacked Iran and started a proxy war they knew was fully preventable with Russia. They let the US blow up Nordstream and helped cover it up. They are cravens and they chose their bed, and they will sleep in it. They could have stopped the rampaging USA with a concerted effort if they wanted to, but they didn't. They liked what it was doing.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Europe's issue is that it is not a particularly unified group, it's a mash of different countries with wildly different cultures that have been carefully kept together so far. The issue is that they are torn between holding together the EU and the abusive relationship with the US, this is how they approach things so weakly, because they must confer and get consensus lasting so long on fast moving issues that the US ends up steamrolling over them. If like you say some european countries took as strong a stance as you want them to, others would not, and it would ultimately threaten the whole union. The US would seize on the split and aim to break it entirely.

There are many contradictions interwoven together driving what's happening.

[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

Then I don't see how a move towards European sovereignty is a thing. I think certain European countries like France are trying to decouple, but for every France, there is a Lithuania and a Kosovo and a Germany that are completely invested in the Burgerlander imperialist project at the expense of Europeans, both worker and capitalist. To really challenge the US, the EU has to still exist. France doing its own thing and Spain refusing to fully cooperate genociding Palestinians while the former Dutch prime minister sucks up to Trump by calling him daddy just weakens EU unity. Ideally, the US wants the entirety of Europe as a vassal, but it could live with a fractured Europe with enough vassals to make sure that Europe can never reunite. At bare minimum, they can count on Germany, the UK, the Baltics, and Kosovo as loyal vassals and can probably rely on the Netherlands, Scandinavia, and Poland as well. That's already a huge chunk of Europe.