PC Master Race

21214 readers

566 users here now

A community for PC Master Race.

Rules:

No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
No NSFW content.
No Ads / Spamming.
Be thoughtful and helpful: especially when new beginners have questions.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

_MoveSwiftly@lemmy.world

The_Vampire@lemmy.world

Fudgeknuckles98@lemmy.world

Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world

IowaMan@lemmy.world

BobaFett26@lemmy.world

CatZoomies@lemmy.world

Xeon@lemmy.ml

geosoco@kbin.social

413

Nvidia really doesn't seem to care about gaming GPUs anymore — the company won't even bother to break down graphics sales in its big investor reports (www.techradar.com)

submitted 2 days ago by sanitation@lemmy.radio to c/pcmasterrace@lemmy.world

121 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Dran_Arcana@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You could definitely do that for rasterization, but if any part of the graphics API required something the card didn't have (like ray tracing) you couldn't synchronize the work between it and another RT capable card fast enough.

See also: why they killed crossfire and sli in the gaming space, and why the derivative works of that technology only exists in the data center for non latency-intensive workloads.