this post was submitted on 22 May 2026
150 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

84875 readers
4765 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone 93 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Their VR Chat clone didn't quite pan out. Their Twitter clone didn't quite pan out. Onto the Reddit clone.

[–] Bloefz@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

One thing I don't understand is why they just didn't buy vrchat or one of the others that are even better. Like spatial or viverse.

Would have been a lot simpler and effective than throwing billion after billion at it.

I mean Microsoft did buy altspacevr and completely screwed it up when they made 'mesh' but Microsoft screws everything up, that's just what they do. It would have been easy to do better than that.

[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago

Yeah, unless they build it into instagram like they did with their snapchat and tiktok clones, I don’t think it stands a chance. Their twitter clone is doing pretty well though I think

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Technically it was a mastodon clone

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

i'm curious: what makes it a mastodon clone over a twitter clone?

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They could federate with servers if only they had servers that wanted to federate with them.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Threads' plan is to implement the ActivityPub protocol, the one the fediverse is based on.

In theory threads could then be federated with other ActivityPub servers (Mastodon and Lemmy for example).

In practice, many instance admins saw it as meta's way to invade that space with their own proprietary bullshit on top of it so they can progressively take control of it. So many decided to block threads as soon as it would be able to federate with their instance.

[–] Bloefz@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Of course the community blocked it. They didn't even try to disguise their EEE attempt (Embrace, Extend, Extinguish). Duh.

And this isn't the first time. Back in the day Facebook messenger was actually fully XMPP federation compatible! But they pulled the plug on that.

[–] vantablack@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 21 hours ago

yup! there was a huge effort over at https://fedipact.online/ with close to like 1000 signatures

[–] itsapollo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Sure. They targeted Fediverse apps like Mastodon and Bluesky.