this post was submitted on 23 May 2026
78 points (98.8% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14371 readers
560 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kristina@hexbear.net 37 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (5 children)

jesus, 100% accuracy over 197 people? basically the only way to be a private person then would be to live in the woods with no internet

i assume it works similar to an airport scanner if it isnt gait analysis, it measures your actual body. excited to have the anti-trans wifi alarm go off when you try to enter the correct bathroom. also incredibly hard to do crime, maybe there is some sort of way to obfuscate your body to make it look like you have large hips (drag gear!) but wont be detected as clothing

[–] Kynsey@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

As far as I know the newer Wifi 6 and 7 standards are way better for this so just keeping your old router would make things a lot fuzzier. Also generally the ones that are the best at this radar stuff are also the ones that have trouble going through walls. Plus in public you don't have privacy anyway with cameras everywhere.

Also since this is examining how radio waves bounce around you could literally just add noise to it. Place decorations around the house that make radio waves bounce like crazy. Coat your ceiling fan in radio reflective material for example.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Even if you don't have WiFi, this could easily be paired with a transmitter (WiFi router/AP). You'd need to make your dwelling into a faraday cage.

[–] Kynsey@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Nah, these newer wifi standards aren't all that good at going through walls. That's why they can be used to track people because they bounce off you. A thick wall will block most of the signal. No need for a faraday cage.

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 16 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Maybe glueing aluminium foil to the clothing to spice up reflections can help.

[–] DogThatWentGorp@hexbear.net 33 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

The end stage of leftist conspiracy theories vs libertarian ones again rears its head:

"You're wearing tinfoil because you believe mole people are trying to microwave your semen with 5g. I'm wearing tinfoil because a public study released showing wifi can be used like sonar and it's literally not even a secret they just published the papers you can read it on a normal website. We're not the same."

[–] tocopherol@hexbear.net 17 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

In 2020 my mom lived in a place where most people didn't mask, she said "If anyone gives me shit I'll say I'm doing it to block the government facial scanning technology." It's interesting that it's a legitimate reason to wear a mask all the time these days.

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 5 points 15 hours ago

Even better if you print a face on the mask.

[–] Salah@hexbear.net 11 points 17 hours ago
[–] kristina@hexbear.net 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

probably dont even need it on the outside just do it around your torso under clothes or something, could probably sew it into a mask as well. theres likely a way to do this comfortably, sew it into a second shirt or something

[–] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 6 points 15 hours ago

just live in the woods with only wired internet. Cat6Gang stay winning.