United Kingdom

6721 readers

169 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

tom@feddit.uk

GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk

frankPodmore@slrpnk.net

Starmer gives tech firms ultimatum to block explicit images on children’s phones (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 15 hours ago by schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 15 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Authoritarian Island makes another blunder.

Seriously what the hell this clearly isn't about helping kids and is about something far scarier.

[–] tankplanker@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Its an absolutely awful way of tackling the problem of sexting and cross sharing of nudes.

Zero chance this won't misidentify content, be easy to bypass, and massively extended.

Does anyone seriously believe that the type of content it looks for won't be expanded in what it searches for, and that it will cover adult devices over time?

Thats before you look at jt as a way for mass role out of device level identity verification dressed up as age verification.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 10 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

The UK is returning to a society pre-Ulysses where freedom of expression is heavily censored with a blunt fist of government overreach.

https://www.ulysseswhiskey.com/post/sir-archibald-bodkin-and-the-banning-of-ulysses-in-the-united-kingdom

The novel was brought to Bodkin’s attention in in 1922 by the Customs Department, which had seized copies of the book being imported from France. Bodkin reviewed the text and deemed it obscene, thus supporting the ban on its publication and distribution in the United Kingdom. The censorship actions led by Bodkin contributed to the broader international suppression of Ulysses, preventing it from being legally available to readers in many English-speaking countries. The censorship of Ulysses by authorities like Bodkin had a profound impact on the literary world, highlighting the tension between artistic freedom and societal standards of morality and decency.

This isn't anything new, it is England regressing to a reactionary violent conservatism it knows well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obscenity_trial_of_Ulysses_in_The_Little_Review

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Its an absolutely awful way of tackling the problem of sexting and cross sharing of nudes.

Almost as if that's just an excuse and not the actual goal. 🤔