this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2026
623 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

85243 readers
4316 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A San Diego police department is facing a lawsuit after jailing a man for a month based on a Flock camera alert that cops allegedly should have known, based on the timestamp, did not depict the car that they were looking for.

Last November, Hugo Parra was arrested on felony charges after San Diego police relied on Flock data and a witness statement to wrongly connect him to an attempted carjacking at gunpoint, the Times of San Diego reported. Cops were looking for a red Alfa Romeo car with tinted windows and a man wearing a gray hoodie, and Parra happened to be wearing a white hoodie while riding in a friend’s car that roughly matched the vehicle description.

Although Flock cameras can capture license plate data, cops did not have even a partial plate to help them verify if the car was involved in a violent crime. But the Flock data cops used to justify the arrest actually showed that Parra was five miles away at the time of the crime, Parra’s attorney, Alex Coolman, told the Times of San Diego. Rather than arrest him, cops could have used that data, as well as Parra’s cellphone location data, to corroborate Parra’s statement that he was innocent, Coolman said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 182 points 18 hours ago (5 children)

These systems are meant to be used against you. Police will never volunteer information that helps you.

[–] liuther9@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

More scared when I see cops rather than thugs

[–] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

In theory the police want to investigate crime and eliminate suspects, but in practice they give up after making an arrest. The access to new technology or information change nothing about this practice.

This is why it’s important to curb these kinds of dystopian surveillance systems in the first place. They change nothing and give reach for further unwarranted intrusions into the lives of citizens. This has been seen as cops using these systems to stalk people.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 9 points 11 hours ago

Sort of. They are required to provide exculpatory evidence... but they only have to provide that information for the trial so you can prepare your defense, not during the active investigation.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 14 hours ago

Look no further than your Miranda rights: "anything you say can and will be used against you."

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 12 hours ago

Police: Here to do jack shit, since the start!