this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2026
921 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

85243 readers
4281 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I mean... I guess it could mean that now, but that is certainly not what it meant originally or how it was ever used.

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 12 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Phantaloons@piefed.zip 3 points 12 hours ago

In the most Peggy Hill way possible.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Is "don't mess with Texas" Chinese?

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I just said its a translation. Yes. From sun tzu I think. In england they translate it the other way I said here.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Except the actual phrase didn't originate from whatever Chinese saying you're talking about. It was an anti-littering campaign, from Texas, in the 1980s.

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

No, its from translating 'the art of war' into an american dialect. EPA just appropriated it.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

You got evidence to back that up? Especially since the EPA had nothing to do with the ad campaign?

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, but it would be very personally identifying.

[–] UltraBlack@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

How is a translation of some ancient public work personally identifying

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 25 minutes ago

Are you guys autistic? They are obviously kidding...