283
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The IRS wants to rewrite its complicated letters to taxpayers and speak to people in plain English.

The federal tax collector is rewriting and sending out commonly received notices ahead of the 2024 tax filing season as part of its new “Simple Notice Initiative.”

“Redesigned notices will be shorter, clearer and easier to understand,” Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said on a Tuesday call with reporters to preview the initiative. “Taxpayers will see the difference when they open the mail and when they log into their online accounts.”

The 2024 tax season begins on January 29.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 86 points 10 months ago

You know that for 90% of people, they could just tell everyone how much they owe and call it good?

Like there’s zero need for us to file taxes because they already know how much we spent. Over all, people would be taxed less because there’s no need to itemize deductions in what is meant to be an obtusely arcane process fundamentally designed to benefit the other 10% while creating an entire industry…

But details.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago

You know that for 90% of people, they could just tell everyone how much they owe and call it good?

Yeah, but intuit owns them, so they won't.

[-] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 42 points 10 months ago

Just FYI, for people living in the following states:

  • Arizona
  • California
  • Florida
  • Massachusetts
  • Nevada
  • New Hampshire
  • New York
  • South Dakota
  • Tennessee
  • Texas
  • Washington
  • Wyoming

You will be able to participate in the pilot program called Direct File.

Unlike Free File, Direct File is open to any income level and is NOT through a third party provider. You are directly filing with the IRS. That said, it is indeed a pilot program and it does not offer many of the usual IRS forms, so check the website to see if you can use this or not.

And for those wondering. Yes, this is exactly the kind of thing Intuit et al lobbied hard to Congress back in 2022 to not pass.

Obviously this isn't the return free system we've been promised since the 80s. But it is a good first step. The IRS has been tasked to report back to Congress when the pilot is over this year. For all we know the new system may work correct right out of the box, may eat some children, or cause the Hoover dam to explode. This is the first time the IRS has been allowed to build such a thing for the public.

Hopefully this all goes off without a hitch, because every success with Direct File is a kick to Goodarzi's nuts. Here's hoping this is the first step towards simplified taxes/return free taxes.

[-] centof@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago

It is so ass backwards that they functionally require(d) an intermediary to file online. It would be so much easier to just have a literal email address (or webpage) where you could send your taxes. Too bad the vast majority of our politicians serve business interests (money) and not the American people.

[-] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

And just to pour it on. Remember that Intuit had a PowerPoint presentation that leaked that indicated the number of challenges they have faced with Congress and the IRS repeatedly trying to create a return-free system. One of the slides from that PowerPoint.

It's amazing to think how much energy and money Intuit has spent to prevent simple taxes for the American public. Like it's been a thing they've been doing since the early 90s. They have gone to great lengths to deny people the ability to just click a button on the IRS website and call it done. The fact that we are actually getting Direct File is in itself an amazing accomplishment considering the massive amount of energy the tax preparation industry has tossed at ensuring this one thing, DID NOT HAPPEN.

Like if anyone actually sits and reads the history of Intuit and the US tax system, it's just some amazing, I cannot believe this happened IRL. Just the sheer knowing how evil they are and how they didn't care because it could affect their bottom line. They knew that they were falsely steering people into their paid product out of the Free File program and they didn't need to that to them. There were internal memos that were published where they admitted, "this is not in the spirit of the program" but failed to change course because "doing so would have significant impact of delivery of product to paying customers."

And the sheer level of money, people, energy, lobbying, etc they were throwing stopping all of this from happening. It's incredible. And yet, we're finally getting a pilot program to do some basic things directly with the Government. How Congress managed the squeak it out is a testament to how so many people wanted to indicate that Democrats did nothing with the two years they were given, and just this one thing was monumental and it's barely anything.

Because the people pushing back to prevent it, the term deep pockets, doesn't even begin to explain it. Like I never thought we would ever get a program like this. Yes, it's massively crippled BUT IT'S SOMETHING. It's just wild that this exists this year, I cannot even think of good words to describe how impossible this felt not but five years ago.

[-] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

For those in and out of those states, there's also Tax Hawk, which has been available for free (for federal taxes) for a few years.

[-] evatronic@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago

Intuit owns legislators, not the IRS.

[-] Endorkend@kbin.social 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That's how it is here.

I get a letter stating how much I owe or will get reimbursed from the information they have.

If I have additional revenue or tax deductions that aren't listed in the prefilled forms, I can add them and submit them (or have a tax accountant do it).

The letter comes with an envelope that doesn't need postage.

Most people don't have to do anything but simply see money appear on their bank account or pay what they owe by a certain date and that's that.

EDIT: Oh and we can access our taxes online with our national IDs.

So while you can opt to do everything on paper, you or your tax accountant can do your taxes online instead of filling in the forms in case the prefilled forms missed anything. The website will have the same info prefilled as the papers did.

And the taxes website has help sections and information popups to explain pretty much every single tax code imaginable.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

That’s how it is here.

I imagine that's how it is in every sane country, yeah.

I get a letter stating how much I owe or will get reimbursed from the information they have.
If I have additional revenue or tax deductions that aren’t listed in the prefilled forms, I can add them and submit them (or have a tax accountant do it).

Does anybody every admit to more income? lol.

The letter comes with an envelope that doesn’t need postage.

That's nice. just rubbing it in, are we?

(lol. sorry, couldn't resist.)

[-] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

How do I move there? 🤔

[-] lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

IMO the only good thing they happened while Trump was president was raising the standard deduction because I no longer need to itemize. It got so much easier and cheaper to file. I still have to do the state taxes though and even without itemizing I'm not exactly an accountant so I do always find it kind of complicated.

this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
283 points (99.3% liked)

News

23422 readers
2790 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS