695
submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Survey of 154 scholars places 45th president behind even ‘historically calamitous chief executives’ linked to civil war

Donald Trump finished 45th and rock bottom of a list ranking US presidents by greatness, trailing even “historically calamitous chief executives” who failed to stop the civil war or botched its aftermath.

Worse for the likely Republican nominee this year, his probable opponent, Joe Biden, debuted at No 14.

“Biden’s most important achievements may be that he rescued the presidency from Trump, resumed a more traditional style of presidential leadership and is gearing up to keep the office out of his predecessor’s hands this fall,” Justin Vaughn and Brandon Rottinghaus, the political scientists behind the survey, wrote in the Los Angeles Times.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 156 points 9 months ago

Honestly, if you talk to most presidential historians they will tell you that you need about 20 years to pass before you can accurately assess a president. There's too many unknowns that will come to light only years or decades after a term ends, Eisenhower is a great example of this. So these rankings are likely to change over the years.

Although, having seen Trump's predilection for fraud, decit, and self-serving, I'd be shocked if he rebounds as more information comes out.

[-] Brokkr@lemmy.world 83 points 9 months ago

In 20 years, we could be up to 48 presidents or more, so you're right, trump's rating could get even lower. Hopefully no one beats him.

[-] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 42 points 9 months ago

In 20 years, the number of presidents might not have increased.

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 9 months ago

Even if the US falls into a dictatorship it's not very likely that Trump makes it to 97.

[-] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

good point, surprised he made it through the stresses of being president once.

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago

It's not stressful when you don't do anything and don't care about anything and others around you.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Exactly he spent four years being applauded and complaining about the food.

[-] Bocky@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

In his eyes that’s called winning.

Also, Fuck Putin, that horrible man.

[-] EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

Can you elaborate on Eisenhower, please?

[-] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago

Eisenhower was always seen as aloof, sort of a figurehead, during his presidency. However, years after, once his papers were made public, a much different view of Eisenhower started to take shape. He was seen more as a hands-on leader. I believe he was in the 15-20th range in the 80s, but by 2000 was up to 9th, and recently up to 5th (8th in current poll).

Here's a preview of a journal article that touches on it a bit.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/1901942

[-] urquell@lemm.ee 14 points 9 months ago
[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

Not yet anyway. Let's hope we don't reach a time when there's a debate whether someone deserves the spot instead of Trump.

[-] OpenStars@startrek.website 2 points 9 months ago

I dunno, perhaps they should change the ranking to throw in some additional items like foot fungus, head lice, 2nd-hand dog vomit and such... and then Trump would remain in last place!? :-P

[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 3 points 9 months ago

At least he didn't start a global war on drugs

this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
695 points (93.9% liked)

News

23517 readers
4537 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS