250
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

More than 1 in 4 American adults identify as "religious nones," meaning they consider themselves to be "atheist," "agnostic" or "nothing in particular," according to a report from the Pew Research Center released Wednesday.

According to the new set of data, 28% of Americans classify themselves as "nones," 17% of whom identify as atheist, 20% as agnostic and 63% as "nothing in particular." Most "nones" said they were raised to be religious, and the majority were raised in Christian households.

The data was mostly based on a Pew Research Center survey of 11,201 respondents that was conducted over the course of a week last summer. The report also drew on a few other surveys conducted in recent years and on Pew's National Public Opinion Reference Surveys.

"When asked directly why they are not religious, two-thirds of 'nones' say they question a lot of religious teachings or don't believe in God," the report said.

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 61 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

A lot of churches will not see this as a sign for self reflection and will instead blame “woke” whatever.

Strange how raping little children, embezzlement, hate speech, subjugation of women and other abuses by various churches might convince people to not associate with a group that perpetuates that.

They literally are doing this to themselves and regularly fail to understand it like a Principal Skinner meme IRL.

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 15 points 10 months ago

I mean apparently most of the departures are coming from mainline denominations as opposed to the evangelicals that are actually growing in number if anything

Just look at Redeemed Zoomer, dude just officially announced a "Reconquista" campaign to take Presbyterianism "back" from "the unchristian liberals" because he thinks acknowledging gay people deserve rights means you don't actually believe in anything Christian and are just peddling whatever is in vogue.

The Church has been left in the hands of its lowest common denominator in the west, and they've grabbed onto the power that offers with every intention to abuse the shit out of it.

Where previous social movements defined themselves around the church, the modern movements have defined themselves by rejecting it altogether, and in doing so have left the crazies with a controlling share of the leftovers.

Kind of a missed opportunity IMO, had movements like Social Gospel and Liberation Theology maintained a visible presence beyond history book footnotes, I could genuinely see modern generations bordering on organizing themselves under crusader iconography.

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

I personally don't want to base my political activity on something I believe wholeheartedly to be a falsehood (specifically, the existence of a god).

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

There is such a thing as a christian atheist, someone who believes the philosophy espoused by Jesus but who rejects the historicity of the bible and even the existence of god.

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

An interesting philosophical exercise I suppose, but the core appeal of following Jesus (and indeed any reason for believing his methods would work) seem pretty linked to the existence of jawheh.

I haven't met any Christian or Muslim atheists, whereas I have met several Jewish and Hindu atheists.

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Think of it as someone who follows Christ by actions rather than by words.

Not a prayer on their lips but willing to give you the clothes off their back if they find you in need.

I think not enough people understand how important good works are supposed to be to the faith.

Saying you believe without backing it up by offering the help you have to give to the misfortuned around you is show you don't actually believe in anything.

[-] butt_mountain_69420@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

The Church has been left in the hands of its lowest common denominator in the west, and they've grabbed onto the power that offers with every intention to abuse the shit out of it

It has ALWAYS been this way. Difference is the freedom of choice. Of course these fukn assholes would love to have attendance, and especially tithing, legally compulsory. Their sociopathic brains can't appreciate the supreme way that could backfire. Thankfully people with 100+ IQs can abstain and ignore, for now.

Anyway, guys like you mentioned are fukn grifters and clowns. Stupid people will always be used by evil people to accomplish their goals. If it wasn't religion, it would be something else that offers the sheep easy answers with minimal cognitive commitment.

Christianity is dying at warp speed, being abandoned by the drones in favor of cryptofascism and stupidity-based nationalism. The evangelicals themselves are redefining the doctrines to include violent extremist ideology.

Donny easily meets the biblical Antichrist criteria without any use of imagination, and yet he is fully embraced by the holy moron community. Their principles have been fully compromised.

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

The southern Baptist church, the largest evangelical denomination in America, had it's peak membership in 2006.

[-] variants@possumpat.io 3 points 10 months ago

Stop waking up, sheeple

[-] vodkasolution@feddit.it 37 points 10 months ago

Still too little of a percentage, in a country of religious estremists

[-] Mortoc@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago

Alternate title: “3/4s of grown-ass adults still believe in magic”

[-] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Yeah I had to read the title twice; that's an insanely low percentage for the modern era

[-] the_q@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago

Good. Religion is stupid in any capacity.

[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

I don't subscribe to that. I think weaponized religion is bullshit.

Pastafarians only bring fun into the world.

Followers of Jedi, live your best life.

Spiritual Buddhism folks, hell yeah.

There's countries where your religion is no different from your preference to ketchup vs mustard. It's just some countries and specific people are fucking assholes.

[-] the_q@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I still disagree. Using someone else's philosophy on life to help guide your own defeats the purpose of experiencing said life. That's me though.

[-] Saxoboneless@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I'm currently nonreligious, but there are hundreds of people that have influenced my personal philosophies. But despite the things I believe having come from or been influenced by other people, I still consider my beliefs to be my own. Why should the beliefs of religious or spiritual people be viewed any differently?

[-] the_q@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Of course you think they're your own. It's important to you to have that feeling of individualism, but you yourself said the opposite. You've been influenced by hundreds, right? How is any of your beliefs your own?

[-] bleistift2@feddit.de 1 points 10 months ago

Using someone else’s philosophy on life to help guide your own defeats the purpose of experiencing said life.

This sounds a lot like “You don’t get to tell me not to touch the hot stove! I want to experience the burn!” – What’s wrong with listening to other’s look on life and see if and how that can benefit you?

[-] the_q@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Because some people don't need to touch a hot stove to feel the heat from it. In your binary view of the world you're either the burned or the observer.

[-] stratosfear 3 points 10 months ago

If every human had to learn from step one we'd never progress. Taking lessons from past experiences is valid in many ways. The alternate side of that is many humans must make their own mistakes to learn those lessons. It's why we rarely listen to our parents. And unfortunately many humans require a group to belong to, as our evolutionary history required the social collective to survive. Which is why religion has been so powerful, especially once the con men realized they could use that "flaw" in human evolution to manipulate people. So for sure we should always be skeptical about being led by others. But I'm afraid the "concept" of religion (groupthink) will likely never go away - it's a huge part of what makes us social creatures. But I absolutely agree that "religion" as a generalization is fucked.

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 31 points 10 months ago

Damn I really thought it'd be more

[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

I remember seeing a similar report 20 years ago and it was something like 4%, with something like 20% are agnostic.

[-] Rolder@reddthat.com 11 points 10 months ago

The term I use to describe myself is Apathestic, which is not really believing or disbelieving in a god or gods because it is irrelevant to your life and not worth thinking about.

[-] garretble@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago
[-] bleistift2@feddit.de 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

For comparison: In 2022, 25% of Germans were members of the Roman-Catholic church, 23% were protestants. About 4% were other Christians. In Between 2019 and 2021, 3–7% were Muslims (depending on the survey). All other denominations sum to less than 1%, leaving some 40% without confession.

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religionen_in_Deutschland

Note that these numbers are from different censuses in different years, and all are rounded, so they don’t add up to 100%.

[-] tygerprints@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

While that's good news overall, I'm unhappy to think that it means 75 percent of adults still believe in superstitious dark ages fictional nonsense. At least the upcoming generation seem to be smarter people and less apt to fall under the influence of the evils of religious belief.

It's more healthy not to believe in a god, than to believe in one. And it's more healthy to put your energy into human relationships that into fictional religious ones.

[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

I have to agree with you on that one. Religion is a disease of the minds.

[-] tygerprints@kbin.social 0 points 10 months ago

Religion is (I think Marx said) the "opiate of the people." And always the poorest people with the least education seem the most readily duped by religious nonsense. And in my opinion, they're the ones who can least afford it.

[-] key@lemmy.keychat.org 1 points 10 months ago

Keep in mind that 2/3rds of "nones" are theists.

[-] tygerprints@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

That's very depressing. I wish people would expend as much energy on helping other people as they do on their nutjob beliefs.

[-] andthenthreemore@startrek.website 3 points 10 months ago

That's not very much.

this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
250 points (95.6% liked)

News

23412 readers
2684 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS