142
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] GrabtharsHammer@lemmy.world 51 points 4 months ago

Well it's a series, but Three body problem. It should have been right up my alley, but I got so tired of every decision by every character being stupid that I couldn't be bothered to read the last fifty pages of the last book.

Even if I charitably assumed the point of the book was to show that people are weak and stupid, the series was such a ham-handed strawman as to undercut its own commentary. And even worse, it had just enough interesting ideas to lead me to believe it was going somewhere worthwhile, but it never did.

It's been years and I'm still pissed off that I wasted a week on it.

[-] v0rld@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago

It's not just that characters make stupid decisions, the same characters keep making the same mistakes and nobody ever learns from those mistakes or grows as a character. It's so extremely frustrating.

[-] MoonManKipper@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

Agreed- the series is massively overrated

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 46 points 4 months ago

I can't remember details since it was in HS, but reading The Catcher in the Rye was a painfully slow and boring process. I didn't get the story, the meaning, the struggle. It was a guy complaining about everything and being miserable and then I had to write a book report about it. Icky, icky, gross.

Maybe if I read it now it'll be different but I dun wanna!

[-] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I enjoy reading unreliable narrators, and so while you're totally correct. Holden is nothing more than an angsty privileged teenager who is angry at the world. That's what made the book fun for me, at a certain point his self serving lies and his cringe attempts to act like an adult are just funny.

I've found it's a good litnus test for people, just like Fight Club or Rick and Morty. You're absolutely allowed to like these pieces, but if you think those charcters are admiral than it's a super duper red flag.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works 39 points 4 months ago

I don't remember what book it was but I walked into a metal pole reading it. I wasn't seriously injured or anything but it was pretty embarrassing.

[-] programmer_belch@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 4 months ago

I am more of a naturalist and walked into a tree

[-] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 31 points 4 months ago

Pride and Prejudice was the most unrelatable book I was forced to read in school. A rich, noble, Victorian family whose main problems are, while they are rich and noble, they are not as rich and noble as they'd like to be. They have no real skills or assets, so rather than pursue trade or business ventures, they put all their eggs in the basket of their daughters being able to swoon and marry the bachelors of richer, nobler, families.

As someone who does not live in Victorian England, grew up poor, and is generally bored when shallow romance is the main theme, that book was hell. It's often praised for showing the differences between classes in that period, which makes zero sense to me because the only classes it compares are the Upper Class and the slightly less rich Upper Class. It would be like a modern book talking about the "struggles" of a family that only has a net worth of $100 million and how hard they have it compared to billionaire families. Boo-fucking-hoo.

I genuinely do not understand how that book is a classic. It's basically Keeping Up with the Kardashians in Victorian times. It's a trash story with trash characters and trash themes. It is the first, and only, book I felt compelled to burn once I was done with. I wouldn't even wipe my ass with it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Chozo@fedia.io 26 points 4 months ago

I've really wanted to get into Stephen King's Dark Tower series, and bought the first few books. I've never managed to make it through the first one, The Gunslinger, even though I've given it probably five or six attempts. I always make it to the same part in the book where Roland and the kid are using the hand-cart through the tunnels, and it just takes so. fucking. long. to get anywhere and for anything to happen, and my mind starts drifting as I'm reading and then I start missing things and have to go back... That section of the book is so frustratingly boring that I can't make it through.

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 16 points 4 months ago

I honestly despise King's longer novels. The Dark Tower series is the epitome of his inability to stay focused and well paced.

It's like he set a goal of some ridiculous book length, thought he needed a bunch of padding to get there, hit the mark and abruptly ends it.

Give me Salem's Lot, Carrie, Pet Semetary, etc all day but I can’t with Dark Tower.

[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 8 points 4 months ago

The Dark Tower series is the epitome of his inability to stay focused and well paced

Probably in part because of the time span over which it was written.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Zirconium@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

I heard from quinn's ideas is you have to be a pretty big reader of king's other works in order to read the dark tower.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[-] bungle_in_the_jungle@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago

We read Macbeth in high school, but they dragged it out over a whole year. It was so painful!

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago

LOL. I had read it before we were taught it in school.

One of the three spirits is described as "An armed head" and the teacher was like "Yeah, nobody really knows what that description means, is a head in a helmet or what it's supposed to be..."

So I raised my hand... "I hope I'm not giving away the ending or anything, but Macbeth is beheaded at the end... it's an arm holding up a severed head. Each spirit is foreshadowing what's going to happen. Armed head, bloody child, king holding a tree."

[-] Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

At my high school we had a teacher who had an advanced degree in Shakespeare studies, and she would teach a different play every quarter. They were great classes, but a single quarter was plenty of time for a very comprehensive look at each play. I can't imagine stretching it out over an entire year and have it be anything but absolutely tedious.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works 22 points 4 months ago

Atlas Shrugged.

There are very few books that have left me with a "This is the face of evil" impression. I tried to give it a fair shake, but this one did, alongside the fact that it devolves into stimulant-addled ranting.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not inherently opposed to stimulant-addled ranting - I like On the Road, for instance - but it just left an awful taste in my mouth.

On the other hand, I enjoyed the Fountainhead, but I was young, usually stoned, and took away an 'integrity of artistic vision' interpretation that resonated. I do not know if this would survive a re-read.

[-] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

I thought it was kind of interesting until the 50 page long rant that John Galt has where he explains why greed and selfishness is good, but all his arguments only work within the bubble of the made up, fantasy society that Rand created. I don't know how anyone could read that and come away thinking "Boy, this sure is relative to modern society. I better base my whole ideology off of it!"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

This was, oh, a decade ago or more. Was reading a book on polyamory and ethical non-monogamy. I can't remember the title, but it was one of the early "big" books on the topic.

It actually made me angry. Not because of the topic, I'm fine with the topic or I wouldn't have picked it up in the first place.

But the author said such STUPID shit like "There's no such thing as a 'reverse gangbang'." And I'm like "Well, shit, man, your search engine must suck!"

It made me angry that he took an important topic and got it so thoroughly and completely wrong. And that people held it up as like this "Important" work on the topic.

Some books are not to be set aside lightly, they are to be thrown with great force.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BenVimes@lemmy.ca 22 points 4 months ago

The Stone Angel.

It's a miserable story about a dying old woman regretting all her life choices. It's also required reading in Canadian high schools because the author is Canadian.

And then, on top of all that, my teacher absolutely insisted that its only major theme was "hope" and docked marks for having any other interpretation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mr_account@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago

Not one book, but almost all of Asimov's Foundation series. The first one is one of my favorite sci-fi books of all time because I love seeing how each group has to use game theory to solve their own unique issue in order to survive and flourish as a society built on science and reason. While I admit that it's not always written well, I love the mindset that Asimov wanted to emphasize: violence should be the last resort for solving conflict between nations. When the factions outside of Foundation threaten them with war, they respond with soft power like economic pressure, religious sway, and focusing on making better advancements to science and engineering to defend themselves by being too valuable to destroy.

The fatal problem with the series arises in Book 2 though. Book 2 (Foundation & Empire) introduces the interesting concept of "what happens when a massive wrench is thrown into the meticulously calculated 1000-year plan?" Unfortunately, you can tell that at this point is when the concepts of the story become too smart for Asimov to handle, and he instead begins his trend of doubling and tripling down on deus ex machina characters with mind control powers for the rest of the series. All of the interesting methods of sociopolitical problem solving are thrown out the window to become sub-par adventure stories.

Books 4 and 5 (Foundation's Edge and Foundation & Earth) were written particularly poorly, and was probably the point where I should have cut my losses. The books follow not-Han-Solo adventure man, contain a sexist female sidekick that only serves to be a hot piece of ass for Asimov's self-insert character to have sex with, and then has an extremely uncomfortable "happy ending" where a traumatized child is left to be groomed by a robotic parental figure so that the robot can one day mind-wipe the child and insert it's own consciousness into their body. What's more is that they completely ditch the core premise of the 1000-year plan, and the ending undercuts any direction that the story could have gone from there.

The prequel books 6 and 7 (Prelude to Foundation and Forward the Foundation) aren't nearly as bad as 4 or 5, but they completely undermine the importance and intelligence of the character Hari Seldon from the first book. Instead of him being a great man and brilliant mathematician on his own, he's essentially led around by his nose by undercover robots that are the secret architects of everything just because Asimov wanted to tie-in elements from his books about robots.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 20 points 4 months ago

L. Ron Hubbard's "Mission Earth" series. I was young, and I'd read damn near all the sci fi that my local library had, I was acught up on the Wheel of Time that had been published to that point (I think it was still about five books before Jordan died), and gave it a try.

It was fucking awful.

Given that I was maybe 12 at the time, that's saying something; it was just trash.

Friends don't let friends read Hubbard.

[-] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I read Battlefield Earth and actually enjoyed it, but in the same I enjoyed eg. watching Plan 9 from Outer Space (or the Battlefield Earth movie for that matter.)

It's an abject piece of shit as a book, written late enough in Hubbard's life that nobody dared edit him so there's whole chapters that just sort of repeat, and many of its premises are so stupid it hurts, but its old-timey pulp scifi schlock feel was often very fun.

So yeah, not a good book by any definition, but it was sorta fun and also interesting to read knowing that Hubbard tried to inject his world view into it too. For example the reason why the Psychlo were so eeeeeevil was that they were ruled by the Catrists who'd eg. use psychosurgery or electric shocks to make Psychlos more compliant – knowing that Hubbard absolutely loathed psychiatrists, it's not hard to see that Psychlo Catrist = psychiatrist.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

I was reading a book at home at age 7, and then my dad slapped me in the bsck of the head.

[-] Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 months ago

I was expecting more answers along these lines. Slightly disappointed with the tangent that people’s answers have taken.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] liam070@sopuli.xyz 17 points 4 months ago

Ulysses

Well, I tried reading it. Then I tried again. I even made a bet with my father who could finish first. We both lost.

It's just a terrible reading experience. Don't know why critics love it, but I have the feeling nobody really understands that gibberish but pretends to do so just to look smart...

[-] Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

Ulysses is a rough one. There are some novels that are so dense that you have to have already read it through once before you can really read it for the first time. I think Ulysses might take three or four.

I started reading it after hearing Robert Anton Wilson talk at length about why he loved the book. He made it sound amazing. And having read it, and read about it, I get why the people who love it really love it. It's a meticulously crafted, ultra dense, heavily embroidered, masterwork of English literature. You can spend years and years reading and re-reading the book, picking apart layer after layer, and still find new elements to explore, and new threads to pull, which still all end up being perfectly internally consistent. It's really an amazing literary achievement.

But it fucking sucks to read for the first time.

You need like a companion reference book, the Internet, a French to English dictionary for one of the chapters, and a map of Dublin. It's not entertainment; it's a project. And honestly, I've found it a lot more interesting to listen to Ulysses experts explaining the book than it is to actually read the book itself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Tiptopit@feddit.org 9 points 4 months ago

Fighting through it at the moment, it just feels like I don't even get half of what is written.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bhamlin@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

I once dropped a book on my face. True story.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

These days I tend not to persevere with books that I'm having a bad experience with. There are just too many good books out there.

Poor writing sucks but even worse is when the author misjudges how much they can expect from the reader. Sometimes things can get 'bad' in a book for just long enough that the reader feels they have risen to a challenge and been rewarded at the next change. Some authors are aware of this and incorporate the dynamic but end up prolonging it too much or over-egging it. I actually feel abused as reader when that happens and end up rage quitting. Unfortunately, deleting an ebook doesn't come with the same satisfaction as burning a physical one in those cases.

The other thing that is a bad experience for me is overly long dialogue expositions, where a character does an infodump to provide background and context and justify the plot. It totally jangles me, bores me and breaks immersion in the story by making me cynical about the authors laziness. An example of this is all the Librarian's waffling about biblical stuff in Snow Crash. Rather than making me care more about the outcome of the plot it just yanked me away from what was a really enjoyable story and setting and destroyed the pace.

BTW, if anyone is interested; Bookwyrm is a fediverse platform for discussing and rating books. Much like a federated FOSS version of Goodreads.

[-] Nemo@midwest.social 15 points 4 months ago

I tripped over a cut-down street sign and smashed into the concrete, scraping my knuckles and brushing my nose and elbows.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RBWells@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

Life of Pi.

2 of my kids had to read it for school, I was looking for something to read, picked it up, they both said "NO, it's so bad." I thought, whatever, it's a slim volume, short read, how bad can it be?

I want that hour or two back. They were right and I wish I'd never read it.

[-] davidgro@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Never read it, but the adaptation - a.k.a. "Cinematography: The Movie" is an amazing watch as long as you ignore the plot.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 13 points 4 months ago

The Wheel of Time series.

Great story; bad books. Literally, the books fell apart while I was reading them. Cheap-ass paperbacks...

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Speculater@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

A series, but The Wheel of Time becomes insufferable around book five. There's like five chapters of lore/world building for every sentence that moves the plot forward. Also, the worst protagonist in the history of book writing. The side characters are the only reason I made it to book five.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] steeznson@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

120 Days of Sodom was a tough read. I don't think it's satire despite what the critics say. Marquis de Sade was literally a rapist but for some reason it is taken as being a meta-commentary on contemporary French society.

[-] SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 months ago

He was just a crazy sadist but he's French so let's call him a philosopher

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

The red/blue/green mars trilogy. The first book was pretty great and the themes were good throughout but the main characters devolve into this weird privaliged manifest destiny hippy cult that doesn't give a shit about the rest of humanity and acts like they got to mars all by themselves and not on the backs of the billions supporting the economies that made the journey possible.

Its the only serie series I've read where I ended up rooting for the oligarchic corporate overlords because even a mars owned by megacorps works out better for humanity than the mars envisioned by the protagonists at this point who are basically turning into a kind of proto-version of the spacers from asimov.

[-] Cyo@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Almost every book I read back when I was a school student.

Each month we had to read a boring book chosen by the school, and at the end of each month we had a annoying test with questions like: "When the protagonist discovered the truth, what was the emotion he felt?" Or "How did the author felt when writing this?" So I had to read 300 pages of a boring book and pay attention to each detail each month.

I don't dislike reading, actually I enjoy good books, but reading something against my will is sickening.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Xenocide, from the ender series. Enders game was good. Speaker was OK I guess. Ender was a whiny bitch the entire time but the descolada mystery was interesting. Now that's solved and he's still a whiny bitch and then he just solves basically every single problem with his super ai that can do magical space/time bullshit. The worst deus ex machina I have ever laid eyes on. I physically threw the book across the room at one point. I hate leaving books unfinished, so I slogged through the rest at like 5 pages per sitting, rolling my eyes out of my head the whole time.

I did not finish children of the mind.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Coskii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 4 months ago

2071: the third oddesy.

I had heard good things about the first one and happened to just see this one in my high-school library. I had a book report due soon so I binged it.

This is the single most boring Sci fi novel I've ever read. It goes on and on and on about the various technologies of the various vehicles of the future. The most exciting part is a flashback to a previous book in which a character kicks a plant, second most is a relatively relaxed flight through a comet.

Normally I can plow through the couple hundred pages in a night, this one took me a bit longer because of how dry it was. There was a entire section on some kind of spinning windshield design used on boats to make sure visibility was always crystal clear.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] durfenstein@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

The german version of Ready Player One. Just the most disrespectful drivel about nerdom i have ever read. Absolutely embarassing and god damn was it a slog. I think that was the only book i ever hated and regretted reading. And after reading a bit of the english original i was even more disgusted as it was even worse...

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

It's not just the German translation, it's not really much better in English. What I managed to get through felt just like a "hey look at these references" and wasn't entertaining at all to me.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

The Scarlet Letter.

It's like it's designed to engender a lifelong hatred for the printed word.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] thisbenzingring 9 points 4 months ago

the underage sex in Snowcrash

the character could have just as easily been made an 18 year old and it didn't need to be there for the story. it was like a record skipping at that moment and I understand wanting to make a crossover for the character to have a sympathetic link to the other character but it was gross and makes it really hard to recommend the book to someone

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] francisfordpoopola@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Reading The Road as a new father. Fuck that. Made me cry.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Been rereading all the books I can ever remember having read in school lately. For the most part they are actually more enjoyable as an adult.

The Scarlet Letter still doesn't hold up though. It's so dry, so boring, so archaic. I crawled through it a few pages a day for like three months because I didn't have the motivation to do any more than that. The movie was even worse.

The Great Gatsby was kind of a slog at first - I actually just gave up on it at some point. But when I eventually came back and started from the beginning again it was fine and reasonably enjoyable.

For those curious, the "books I can remember having ever read in school" are A Doll's House, A Modest Proposal, Animal Farm, From the Mixed-Up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler, Ghost Cadet, Hatchet, Holes, I am the Cheese, Inherit the Wind, Lord of the Flies, Maniac Magee, Night, Number the Stars, Of Mice and Men, Pygmalion, The BFG, The Great Gatsby, The Kid Who Became President, The Man who was Poe, The Metamorphosis, The Most Dangerous Game, The Old Man and the Sea, The Pearl (?), The Scarlet Letter, Crash, To Kill a Mockingbird, Bud Not Buddy, The Lottery, Fahrenheit 451, The Catcher in the Rye, and The Crucible. Plus a lot of Shakespeare. So far I've reread all of those before Mockingbird, and none of them from Mockingbird. This only includes books we were made to read, or which our teacher read to us in earlier grades (BFG, Hatchet, Mixed-Up Files, etc)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lemmy_get_my_coat@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

I tripped up some stairs reading ASOIAF

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Always Sunny On It's Always Filladelphia.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
142 points (95.5% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27073 readers
1473 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS