109
submitted 3 months ago by bcgm3@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 64 points 3 months ago

Stop fucking edging me god fucking damn.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 78 points 3 months ago

Nobody should want these guys to finish the job, especially before the election. That's a recipe to end up with President Vance, and the man is an absolute moron. He makes Dan Quayle look like the spelling bee champion.

Donald Trump doesn't deserve to die from an assassin's bullet. He deserves to die of natural causes, in prison.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 25 points 3 months ago

Vance is immensely unlikable even amongst the republican base. And the past eight years have made it clear that trump can only really get trump elected. The only downside of him going to hell is that it will give republicans a few more years to figure out their post-trump pivot (which seems to be liz cheney).

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 17 points 3 months ago

I feel like with Vance if no one specifically woke him up in the morning and made him his pop tarts he'd just miss the inauguration

[-] Furedadmins@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

I heard he is banned from Hyatt place chain wide since they all have couches.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Oh god he locked himself in the junior suite with the futon, call the fire department

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You are right, but I dont think the cult would unify around someone else that quickly. In fact, I think chaos that nobody that is sane would truly want would immediately ensue.

On the other hand, every minute he is allowed to operate is a minute that extremists like the Proud Boys, Christian Nationalist, and just an unimaginable rogue gallery of others is actively injected into roles that they can cause extreme damage at.

The unfortunate part is my second point will continue being true rather Trump is bunking in Reagan's torment pitch or not. Mask off will be the policy going forward, just manipulative nasty shit that gets nothing done but the rich richer and the Earth sicker.

Edit: and since I'm ranting I'd like to add; I care not one bit about "justice" served to Trump. I care only that we can recover from and avoid the circumstances that brings people like him to power. Send him to oblivion, lock him in a cell, leave him to die in an old person's home alone once he outlives his use, whatever. I care that we notice what brings these people to power; Fear, Instability, and the abandonment of our own citizens. If we dont educate and care for one another, we are more susceptible to fascism again and again. If we dont strengthen our most vulnerable, and instead cater to those who already have everything, this will just happen again.

[-] JWBananas@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Let's not pretend that the man doesn't know exactly what he is doing. His only deficit is in charisma.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago

Also, if trump's out, I could totally see someone like Romney stepping up, playing the "adult in the room" card, rallying a ton of centrists and economic right folks and getting just enough of the maga types (because he's not a minority woman) to win.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

While I would take Romney over the majority of Republicans, there is zero chance that he would rally any kind of enthusiasm with the Republican base. In fact, he would likely drive away undecided voters who were leaning Trump since he is reasonable and the only reason to go with Trump is because of misremembering his time in office or wanting a narcissistic strong man.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

Again I only think a Romney type creature could find any toe hold in a post trump... Absence.

But totally speculation, could go 180. Loomis 2025?

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 months ago

There's 0 chance the RP would put Vance up as the new nominee, unless they're already bound and required to.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

I want trump to die. In a supermax.

[-] cbarrick@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Assassination would be good for MAGA. They'd worship him as a martyr.

I'd like Trump to die ASAP. From natural causes, like a heart attack from eating too much McD's.

[-] Catma@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

He is going to be a martyr no matter how he dies.

The conspiracy theories around his death are going to make every other conspiracy theory look quaint.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Why would that not martyr him anyway?

If I were to die now they would say it was so that my soul could lead them.

- Paul Atreides, Dune 1965

[-] BlucifersVeinyAnus@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 months ago

They always look for genitalia, Leto thought. Perhaps I should have something made, a gross protuberance to shock them.

  • Leto II 2.0, God Emperor Of Dune, 1981
[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Nah bruv, let him live a decade in prison.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 58 points 3 months ago

Protect Donald Trump

Vote for Harris to enact common sense gun regulations.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

I'd love for you to be right but Id say any national gun reform will be crushed by the Supreme Court or a split senate.

[-] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 6 points 3 months ago

I hope Harris is elected and has the brass ovaries to pack the court and give Roberts the finger.

[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

That's probably true. But one of these decades maybe we can figure it out. Not because of Orange. Because of the school shootings. Maybe. Eventually.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Just gonna say it:

Donald trump is the single greatest argument for 2A rights we have ever seen.

Granted: We need at least some basic changes- universal background checks. waiting periods to let those happen. ban bump stocks. ban anything like bumpstocks.Trump being the best argument doesn't change that we need basic reform, and we've needed it for decades.

[-] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Why?? Every time someone uses political violence the would be dictator becomes more popular and he can make the state more repressive. Even right now, there will be idiot undecided voters that will change their vote to him because some idiot tried to kill him. There are really no upsides to attempting to remove tyrants with guns.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 34 points 3 months ago

“let an entire country have guns. what could go wrong?”

where was the “good guy with gun” to save the day? excluding professional trained security members

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Well, in some sense, that's precisely what the Secret Service was in this case -- the proverbial good guy with a gun.

I think the fringe 2A people basically want a world that is some combination of the wild west from movies and a militarized society filled with bodyguards and escorts.

Note: they all always assume they're a protagonist or antagonist in this hypothesized world, i.e., they're always the person with bodyguards, a body guard, or an outlaw with a gun moving through the tumbleweeds. They're never all the random people killed along the way.

[-] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I literally said excluding professionals.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That doesn't mean they can't discuss it Jesus Chris Lemmy simmer down. This isn't couples therapy

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago

They promise guns in every hand while hiding behind bulletproof glass like a scared little biatch

[-] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

i find it strange that there would be shots fired and the perpetrator would survive to tell a tale.

on the other hand, the secret service agents must despise that dipshit more than anyone, since he willingly put their lives at risk multiple times, so i have hard time imagining they would be in on any sort of pre-planned PR show...

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

The guy was behind a fence, with just the barrel of the gun poking through, so it's not too surprising their shots missed.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago

The effective range of an AK-47 is 380 yards. The shots were taken somewhere between 300 and 500 yards. I don't think the shooter had a chance of making that shot and it is more likely that he was just trying to make himself famous.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Think of how more famous he would be if he took out the first p[resident who attempted a coup and tried to get his VP killed!

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

Lol perhaps a "count to three then act" rule

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

Oh did he do everything always to make everybody everywhere want him dead?

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 months ago

I have this sneaking suspicion that the first attempt was the equivalent of Columbine and, just like with the explosion in school shootings since then, any loser that wants to make a name for themselves is going to take shots at politicians.

[-] Default_Defect@midwest.social 3 points 3 months ago

Gonna be honest, I'd rather have a bunch of failed assassinations of politicians than any school shootings at all.

[-] BlucifersVeinyAnus@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 months ago

As long as they don’t start claiming to be time travelers I think we’re still okay

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Anyone with a functional brain knows Trump is a threat to democracy. So I have a feeling this won't be the last attempt

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago
[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Nobody warming up their aim before doing this lol? New Trump dlc dropped.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
109 points (91.0% liked)

politics

19233 readers
2193 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS