4
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by cheese_greater@lemmy.world to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.ca
  • Sorta like Where's Waldo but conceptually or lexically?
top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] j4k3@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I think reading comprehension is far more complicated than any one method can encompass. This might help some people but hurt others. For me, it would be a distraction to try and focus on other aspects like a word. However, if you asked me about the word later, it would stand out in my mind regardless. When I was much younger, I wouldn't have understood why you might be asking me to find a word like this. I lacked the self awareness to understand how differently I perceive the world through abstraction and how others comprehend on a different level.

Personally, I tend to read slowly, but I naturally have unusually high comprehension. If I am constrained to some isolated idea prior to reading, that idea may limit my abstracting conceptualization and oversimplify my comprehension... but I'm an outlier.

this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
4 points (70.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

2174 readers
2 users here now

There is no such thing as a Stupid Question!

Don't be embarrassed of your curiosity; everyone has questions that they may feel uncomfortable asking certain people, so this place gives you a nice area not to be judged about asking it. Everyone here is willing to help.


Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca still apply!


Thanks for reading all of this, even if you didn't read all of this, and your eye started somewhere else, have a watermelon slice ๐Ÿ‰.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS