274

Summary

Elon Musk accused Alexander Vindman, a key witness in Trump’s first impeachment, of treason on social media, suggesting he should face “the appropriate penalty.”

Musk’s comments followed Vindman’s claims that Musk may have shared sensitive information with Russia’s Putin and used Twitter for disinformation.

Vindman denied the accusations and called Musk’s remarks baseless.

Critics condemned Musk’s statements as dangerous, especially given his ties to Trump’s incoming administration.

Musk provided no evidence for his claims, reviving past allegations against Vindman of “dual loyalty” rooted in antisemitic tropes.

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 129 points 2 days ago

This motherfucker is out here acting like he's a government official of some sort and has some sort of power lolwut. Go fuck yourself, Lonny.

[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago

Here's the kicker: A proper government official shouldn't try to tell the department of Justice who to charge like that either.

[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago

But this is Trump we're talking about!

[-] thisphuckinguy@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

He’s just Trump’s bitch

[-] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

I think you reversed it

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago

When does the illegal immigrant Elon get the appropriate penalty?

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

When he isn't a ~~billionaire~~ mockery of a dragon.

[-] xenomor@lemmy.world 70 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The most ironic part of the new US oligarchy is that the republicans built it by feigning outrage about the influence of ‘unelected’ bureaucrats, the ‘swamp’ of monied DC influence peddlers, and a ‘deep state’ of rogue agencies wielding unaccountable power. Musk is an unelected government contractor who built most of his fortune on federal contracts, and tax credits. He is the world richest individual, throwing his money around to wield influence in DC. Now, he’s encouraging a federal agency to punish what he perceives as a political rival for speech that he doesn’t like. Musk has hit a hypocritical trifecta. Of course Americans, in general, are too stupid to realize any of this.

[-] buttfarts@lemy.lol 20 points 2 days ago

America is going to end up getting kneecapped entirely because a critical mass of Americans are dipshits who are too goddamn stupid to survive as the housecats of civilization.

[-] skozzii@lemmy.ca 65 points 2 days ago

Elon is not an American, remember that when he is a making your laws and tries to get the constitution changed so he can be president next.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

I'm not American and I live in America. That's not the issue. I'm allowed to have an opinion on politics, laws, I can even vote for mayor or similar in some states.

[-] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 days ago

There's a general argument - not strictly applicable to you, I don't know you - to be made that a natural-born citizen of a given country is more likely to be loyal to that country than a "foreigner", for lack of a better word, and more familiar with its culture and society. It makes sense then that a country would want to restrict their higher public offices to "their own people". (How much those people actually care for the wider body of constituents is a different question, of course.)

Voting on local politics that influence you more directly isn't the same as participating in federal politics. Musk is essentially a foreign actor, he shouldn't have such influence over the government of a different people.

(He shouldn't have any influence at all, actually, but I'm just talking about the "try to change the law so he can run for president" concern you responded to)

[-] Linktank@lemmy.today 72 points 2 days ago

It's like nobody is even trying to kill Elon Musk.

[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

I've said before - have you actually seen him in a situation where he'd be vulnerable like that?

There is a level of rich, and I don't know if it's when you make hundreds of millions or your first billion, but at some point it just becomes easier to only travel to secure venues by escort.

The security prices these guys pay must be insane to us, but likely a drop in the ocean for them.

Why do you think the flight tracking bothered them so much? Because it broadcast arrival and departure times, and destination. That allows planning.

If the public doesn't know when you arrive and when you leave, or how you arrive or how you leave, that's just a bit of added security.

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Good planning goes a long way though, let's not be pessimistic.

[-] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I thought there's still a bot tracking him, just not on Twitter anymore.

[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

So, he's never really Elon.

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

I wonder how long that will last…

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

One of their robots will probably step up first.

[-] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 58 points 2 days ago

I hope we all live to see Don and Elon’s treason trials and the debates over hanging before and after.

[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago
[-] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

It's all in your [their] hands.

Whether we will or not is a matter of what America is like.

I am not making a judgment call here, just an observation.

[-] youstolemyname@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Not sure that's going to happen.

A) They'll probably opt to take the Hitler way out

B) If they don't, they are liable to be publicly executed and mutilated

There's no stopping this train. The US cannot save itself and no country is going to step in until we're at a full blown WW3 situation.

[-] 4lan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Our best hope is assassination

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The appropriate punishment is clearly laid out by the UCMJ. Musk can get fucked, since Vindman isn't subject to US laws.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago

This fucking asshole must be dealt with.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

I assume you mean Musk? He already seems to be trying to buy his way into a shadow position in the UK, since handing the US to Putin isn't even close to enough.

[-] NeuronautML@lemmy.ml 34 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I wish i heard less about Elon Musk. I'm so tspped out on this dude. Every time a new article has Elon Musk in the title my eyes involuntarily roll over into the back of my skull as both an expression of annoyance and a self defense mechanism.

[-] blackbelt352@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

We're stuck between an overabundance of constant "elon musk said this concerning thing" reporting on his every move because that brings in ad revenue but not hearing about his might be worse because he's basically operating without any kind of spotlight on him.

God what profit seeking and media consolidation has done to journalism, and our collective faith in journalists is an atrocity.

[-] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago
[-] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 21 points 2 days ago

Oh oh some overly rich GenX’er wants to play Judge Dredd?

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Soon Vindman will be a Congressman and President Musk's threats will be illegal

[-] Tower@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago

It was his twin brother, Eugene, that was elected. Alexander was on the phone call with Trump and Zelensky, reported the issue to Eugene (who was an NSC ethics lawyer).

I thought the same until like 3 days ago.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

I am promoting the idea of calling Musk President. The sooner ingrained, the sooner the orange narcissist will become even more unhinged leading to the inevitable fallout that will happen in any case.

[-] ubergeek@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

Not if the SCOTUS thinks it's an official.act of the presidency....

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Actually, it is even illegal then but not prosecuted it seems.

[-] BigPotato@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Trump first then, Elon.

[-] TomMasz@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

I missed the part where we elected Leon president.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Pretty roundabout way to declare war, isn't it?

this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
274 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19148 readers
1927 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS