253
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] shikitohno@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

I have a risk mitigation strategy for them which ought not to be novel, but sadly seems to be, which could probably bring this risk down to statistically insignificant for most of these people. Don't build your business on amassing obscene amounts of wealth via trampling the rights and dignity of millions of people who are only one bad week away from destitution and having all they've struggled their entire lives to build stripped from them, who have literally nothing to lose when it all goes pear shaped. Consider not only the financial, but the social costs of your actions.

The executive and financial elites of this world seem to have forgotten that humans are animals, and an animal backed into a corner is at its most dangerous, prone to lashing out in unpredictable ways.

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 101 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"Calls for targeting the executive team, their families, homes, and places of work using a variety of online and offline means to harass, disrupt, and harm the individuals and the organizations have become widespread."

I'd argue that this is a non issue that doesn't warrant additional attention, as it only affects less than 1% of the population.

Instead, do more to combat drunk driving, that will have a bigger meaningful effect on the populace.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago

I would suggest the cops investigate health care companies so people don't feel like they have an obligation to do something.

[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

I think a lot, or maybe even most of them don't really care about effect on the populace, just the effect on the 1% richest of the population. It is sad to see.

[-] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 59 points 2 days ago

I thought the killing WAS the warning.

[-] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago

They’re afraid. Good

[-] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 305 points 2 days ago

While law enforcement does not believe Thompson's killing is part of a trend targeting health executives, the attack underscores the vulnerability of these high-profile executives.

Yes, very vulnerable people. I mean, not as vulnerable as an elderly cancer patient who's been denied care, or a working class family driven to bankruptcy by medical debt, but, you know vulnerable to righteous retribution. Except, they're not really even vulnerable to that, since they have the resources to pay for private security.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Judging from the pay I would say CEO should be one of the most dangerous jobs. That's the only way the pay would make sense. Let's make it so!

[-] KillerTofu@lemmy.world 86 points 2 days ago

You and your friends better batten down the hatches, because when it hits, you're all gonna wonder how you ever thought you could live so large and leave so little for the rest of us.

[-] Draegur@lemm.ee 56 points 2 days ago

Let's not warn or threaten, actually; it spoils the element of surprise.

Ideally, the enemy should never see it coming.

[-] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 2 days ago

You never say, ‘I’m gonna fight you, Steve.’ You just smile and act natural, and then you sucker-punch him

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Nougat@fedia.io 171 points 2 days ago

I am looking at another headline right now: "White House condemns using violence to tackle 'corporate greed'"

When corporate greed is out of fucking control, and nobody is lifting a finger to do anything about it via legal channels, what the fuck else do you think is going to happen?

I'm also amused by how reporting on this has been "We're trying to work out what his motive was," when it's so clear that everybody knows what it was. They are fucking us, every day, and this guy got pushed to his breaking point. The fact that there's been such vocal support for Claims Adjuster - not just indifference - suggests that a whole lot of people are real close to their breaking points.

This is how revolutions begin.

load more comments (20 replies)
[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 53 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'm not even going to read their warning. Law enforcement should shut up and quietly do their job. No one has to talk to the pigs and if they dont show some respect to the public, no one will. So if they want to be professionals they should pipe down and keep their "warnings" to themselves.

[-] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago

I mean, doing their jobs is protecting the wealthy. They don't exist for any other reason.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 119 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

"People shouldn't be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people."

[-] KillerTofu@lemmy.world 59 points 2 days ago

I hate that V for Vendetta it’s kind of playing out right now.

I know why you did it. I know you were afraid. Who wouldn't be? War, terror, disease. There were a myriad of problems which conspired to corrupt your reason and rob you of your common sense.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Nanook@lemm.ee 114 points 2 days ago

"Over the last two years, online activity has indicated a growing negative sentiment around conglomerates, the wealthy, and executive staff at private and public organizations," the bulletin said. "Calls for targeting the executive team, their families, homes, and places of work using a variety of online and offline means to harass, disrupt, and harm the individuals and the organizations have become widespread."

I wonder why…

[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 94 points 2 days ago

Bitch please. That's how unions got shit done. The boss made threats? Cops come to beat up and shoot at striking workers? Then the workers show up at the boss' house and burn it down or beat the crap our of him. That's how it used to be done.

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 50 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

We allowed the centrists to take over, and their hippy “Follow the rules. violence is bad but we’ll back state sanctioned violence” shtick has ruined a century of progress.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world 65 points 2 days ago

Law enforcement is now seeing the line between corperations and people and guess who they have to defend.

ACAB

[-] slickgoat@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

Not American, but curious as to why you don't vote for polices that prevent the healthcare ripoff?

I mean, it's all well and good applauding a single man's actions, but you all could affect change of there was a genuine will to do so. Other western countries don't have this problem that you are seemingly powerless to change?

[-] ramsorge@discuss.online 11 points 1 day ago

What is vote? We elect people, not policy. Then those people get purchased by companies, and they do whatever is best for the company.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Not American, but curious as to why you don’t vote for polices that prevent the healthcare ripoff?

Because they aren't on the ballot.

[-] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 days ago

And when they are they're so stuffed full of pork that to vote for healthcare you also have to vote for having your bones ground for tomorrow's bread.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 2 days ago

The wealthy own everything. The media, the campaign funding, the concert venues, the restaurants, the farmland, the water, the houses, the offices, the railroads, the textbook publishers. Fucking everything. The only thing our government does well is print more money for the rich.

[-] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Because we are powerless to change it.

The corporations have lobbied (bribed) both political parties so hard that both sides work for them.

Any attempt to change the voting system gets shot down because the people in power don't want to change the system, because it benefits them. Why make the game fair when it's rigged in your favor?

Half the country is brainwashed into thinking any social help or reform is socialism (which is pure evil! Helping others is evil!) and a trick from the inept party to try to gain political influence. And the inept party just fails to deliver on any sort of reform because they want to appeal to that brainwashed half of the country.

Any grass roots effort that makes any traction gets shot down by the establishment, usually by rileing up the brainwashed half.

We WANT the change. But even if we could get the brainwashed half to vote for it, the system is so rigged and broken even if we did vote it in they would veto it or change it in two years.

[-] BigBenis@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Because America is not a functional democracy but rather an oligarchy driven by the will of the elite.

[-] H0neyc0mb@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago

Healthcare was barely even discussed during the last election. Trump has no plans to improve it and Harris didn't campaign on it. We can't just directly vote for laws, we have to elect leaders that would write a bill and vote for it. And pretty much everyone in Congress is bought out by Big Pharma, which has more money than god so it buys elections.

[-] Matombo@feddit.org 21 points 2 days ago

tl;dr the USA is not really a democracy, just as the founding fathers intended.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Infinite@lemmy.zip 22 points 2 days ago

There are several (very simplified) factors:

  • the parties in power won't fix voting so others can join in proportionally
  • the parties in power are mostly guided by the wealthy (often via corporate influence), just with slightly different flavors
  • many of our citizens are one or more of poorly educated, uninformed, radicalized, and selfish
  • the wealthy tend to support policies that keep them wealthy and the electorate controllable
[-] UnhingedFridge@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

A lot of people on the right have been duped by those taking advantage of them for profit, making them focus on the left somehow being evil through the targeting of identity politics. Many are just now waking up to the fact that the talking heads they trust have made their worth by dividing us.

It's all thanks to oligarchs and using their money to buy out policies from lawmakers while making their constituents stay angry elsewhere. Our whole system has been fucked for a while, unfortunately.

[-] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago

Somehow people were voting for the republicans to fix healthcare. Yes, it's true.

The second thing is that US legislators have about 40% yearly profits on their investments. So they are very incentivized to make things better for the owning class. Or at least not make it any worse.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago

Strange how they were completely incapable of understanding this concept when it comes to right wing violence.

[-] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 36 points 2 days ago

“It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.” -Henry Ford

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
253 points (96.0% liked)

News

23541 readers
4365 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS