I usually code in Language or Script
this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2024
543 points (98.6% liked)
Programmer Humor
25098 readers
1721 users here now
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Don't we all? Amen.
Javascript is basically like Java but with some scripts in it
But what about script java?
That’s 𝒥𝒶𝓋𝒶.
Hey, no cursive here, this is a family instance.
I highly doubt anyone would guess ANSI C is what I'm talking about if I referred to it as C+
The list shows TempleOS's HolyC was known as C+ before. I am sure that is it
Language
I have job for you “language” programmers.
Requirements; -minimum 8 years of experiences Etc…
my main language is script java
It's just C++ without templates. So whatever element you want to put into std::list, it must virtually inherit std::list::value_type. And of course there will be a macro-based list monstrosity inside Boost.
Types being declarable as virtual members is something I want to never hear again
c+=0.5
And C‡ is once again not included. For shame.
Holy-C used to be called C+, I think.
And then, comes ScriptJava
Thats just HolyC before it became holy
What kind of programming language is language?
lol it’s like c++ but we removed friend classes and other bullshit no one uses lol
Ah yes, I too, program in the Language programming language
To be fair, compiling C code with a C++ compiler gets you all the warnings from C++'s strong-typing rules. That's a big bonus for me, even if it only highlights the areas of your C that are likely to become a maintenance hazard - all those void* casts want some documentation about what assumptions make them safe. Clang will compile variable-length arrays in C++, so you might want to switch off that warning since you've probably intended it. Just means that you can't use designated initialisers, since C++ uses constructors for that and there's no C equivalent. I'd be happy describing code that compiles in either situation as "C+".
Also stops anyone using auto, constexpr or nullptr as variable names, which will help if you want to copy-paste some well-tested code into a different project later.
Isn't auto a keyword in C?
It means something else.
Signed C
Didnt knew Arduino is a programming language now.
To be honest I'm still confused by a lot of these microcontroller languages (PlatformIO/Arduino/ESPHome)...
Are they just drag and drop feature blocks that are essentially C macros, but you never get to see the code and its all abstracted with flow diagrams?
The standard Arduino platform is essentially C, just with some standard hardware-near procedures hidden away as far as I know. You can just write standard C code in two blocks: init and loop. Then the loop block will be repeated for ever. For controlling voltage pins you have easy commands similatlr to like pinState(PinNumber, on/off). I do not know about the others you mentioned, but there definetely is also some implementations for Raspberry Pi control by drag&drop. There is no need to limit yourself with those though.
I don't know about the others, but Arduino is literally just C++ with some macros/library functions.
Becerdik Patrick! Ülkemizi kurtardık!
I was not expecting turkish Spongebob today
Ama SpongeBob... Ben C bilmiyorum! Tek JavaScript yazmayı biliyorum!
Now I want to learn Algol++
Go