Europe
He's very hard to understand and is hard to follow since he keeps repeating himself, throwing claims around, not backing them up properly. Maybe I'm asking too much here but maybe i should wait for the tldr
Text version. He covers more than eighty years of Western history in thirty minutes, such that there’s only enough time to sketch it, leaving no time to flesh it out or defend it. I’ve heard & read more detailed & sourced explanations of his individual points on DiEM 25 and YouTube[1][2] and his website. There are also his books.
Thats actually an interesting read! Thanks. Its way better with his complicated speech, accent and long winded arguments.
And yes, he goes through a long time and I think he has a point. But i think a lot of folks know hum by now and if the european left invited him thats also not the worst sign.
I only started to look at it and am already pissed. So I stopped because it would probably only make me exen more angry. What a lying piece of dirt.
Can you be more specific? I know he isnt either but it would help me at least understand you better.