this post was submitted on 20 May 2026
788 points (98.9% liked)

me_irl

7735 readers
1060 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 37 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How do I make a profit from that though?

[–] BonsaiBoo@lemmy.world 30 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The funny part is it would be more profitable than what's happening now as the ultra wealthy have convinced a majority of voters to keep wages low, keep taxes low for the wealthy, higher for the non wealthy, turn the US into a purely service and gig economy, and so now the economic system is slowing and grinding to a halt as fewer and fewer people can participate in all sectors, from necessities to leisure spending.

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Exactly, if an economy is an engine then money is the oil; if it pools (by a few people hoarding it) then there's less flowing through to lubricate the engine turnover and it ceases up.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Need to open those reservoirs and help the gears turn

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago

If the oil ceases to flow the engine could certainly seize up

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

there are enough rich people to keep it going for generations.

but it's true that wealth inequality generates slower economic growth than wealth equality does.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Aneb@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Might as well be a geek too!! Lammme

[–] TotallyWorthLife@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The lack of it is not a trend, but a consequence of a deliberate effort to keep it that way.

I want to believe capacity for empathy and sympathy (both for good and bad) are inherent to us all (with some exceptions), even if clouded or even manipulated by the lack of critical thinking, which I do consider a skill one has to train (and not related to being smart/intelligent or dumb/stupid).

I believe, if we all had enough critical thinking (I know I don't fully have it, even if it has gotten better with time), we would have been working together for each other instead of fighting and fucking over each other for the benefit of people in positions of power.

So, hoping for an "empathy and critical thinking" trend isn't going to save us the same way hoping for a "cancer suddenly disappears" trend won't save someone with cancer. It is like this by design, not by coincidence, and we must do a deliberate effort to change it.

As suggestions I know of or have heard of:

  • Bear in mind others might have gone through shit that made them the way they are right now (different culture, different conditions, trauma, indoctrination, etc.). To realize that no one is inherently evil, but the conditions we are given (our genes + our enviroment) shape us, has helped me stop hating others for their way of being, and instead wonder what led them to be like that. I never became more or less empathethic, I just changed my POV.

  • Read and write more to train the brain to take information, process it, and send it in or out, more effectively. And be more mindful of what you do write. (It also helps train the brain against degenerative diseases. Won't stop them, but might still slow them).

  • Check facts on more than one source to avoid biases, left-out info, or straight up lies or manipulation. Don't just read headlines and keep scrolling. Helps get a wider view of the world, know what goes on more precisely, and, like reading, trains the brain. (Also, bear in mind some articles are more about giving opinions or uncomplete information, than stating proven facts)

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

People actually subscribe to AI. As such, the likelihood decreases daily.

[–] Kanda@reddthat.com 5 points 3 days ago

They pay for chatbot? The thing everyone is furious to get when they're trying to reach customer service?

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I have never heard a person talk about empathy introspectively. Invariably it has been about how someone else needs to be more empathetic, and almost always, the speaker would hypothetically be the beneficiary of this increased empathy.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I have never heard a person talk about empathy introspectively

Happens more often than you might think, but rarely in online discourse or Internet blowharding.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

yep. it's weaponized and used to shame people into agreement.

people also don't have general empathy, they have it for specific other persons they identify with and they tend to totally lack it for those they don't identify with.

people also generally mean 'feel bad for' when they use the term. true empathy is more about being able to put yourself in someone else's shoes and relate to their experience, it's not an abstraction. empathy doesn't make you feel bad, it helps you understand others experiences... but it's not used that way colloquially and definitely not that way on the internet.

the thing people really do when they go on about empathy, is pity. and when they demand empathy for themselves, they are demanding pity for themselves.

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

People in the west need to adopt more Buddhist language. One facet of empathy often overlooked is sympathetic or appreciative joy, also known as mudita, one of the four brahma viharas. Empathy doesn't always have to be about negatives, and mudita is a good inoculant against envy.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

people in the west don't do that. they warp eastern beliefs to suite themselves, and turn buddism into an exercise of ego-building, rather than ego-minimizing that is supposed to be. we are insanely ego-centric and we distort any belief system we encounter to fuel that egocentrism.

It's why the west like Freud so much, but not so much Jung. Because Jung was about collectivist ideas, and Freud was all about our struggles with ourselves and our struggles as individuals against other individuals.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 9 points 4 days ago

I hope she’s prepared for disappointment

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

So, you vegan, then? Or just empathy for your close circle and other psychological extensions of yourself?

[–] elbiter@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The current global trend of fascism and cheap individualism is not spontaneous. It has been promoted with billions of dollars.

[–] Aneb@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Fuck there's trillionares now

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (7 children)

everyone thinks themselves as empathic and thinking critically, in their own mind, it's everyone else that is wrong...

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Critical thinking must include critically questioning one's own thoughts and behaviors as well. That's the only way forward.

Question everything, especially the things you've always thought were true. People would be surprised if they realized just how many false ideas and urban legends they've been taught by people they thought were credible.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 days ago

The person who downvoted you clearly doesn't like to think critically about their own assumptions or be reminded that they should...

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago

Elon Musk literally said he thinks empathy is a weakness. So no, the greedy ghouls running our modern civilisation don't think they are empathic, and they have no desire to be. And a lot of poor temporarily-embarrassed billionaires emulates them in that regard.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 days ago

No, I guarantee you some people don't think about those things at all, or are even actively hostile towards them as concepts.

And then there are people who only focus on one at the expense of the other, under the assumption that they're mutually exclusive.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

In my mind it's a very specific set of people who are wrong, and I do not have empathetic thoughts towards them.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If you can't empathize with your enemy, you'll constantly be surprised by their actions.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 3 days ago

Nah, I just have to assume they're going to do whatever the worst thing is and I'm always right.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

Modern hot takes always gotta come with a picture of a rando.

A nice idea but highly unlikely.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago

I'm skeptical how can i make money off this?

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Narrator: It wasn't.

[–] Clutter@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

Well there are currently places where that is indeed a thing. Just not in the USA...

[–] zxqwas@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Has any of the trends so far required a lot of effort to do?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 3 days ago (5 children)

What am I looking at? Is that arm part of that lady's body? Why is she sideways?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago

WHO MAKES THE MONEY??!!?!

[–] FatTony@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Don't worry guys I'll comment something relevant as soon as I find out what's going on in that picture.

load more comments
view more: next ›