this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
19 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

42695 readers
63 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 3 points 12 hours ago

I use the R1 variant on my local only machine. It's great for logic and analysis. Depending upon speed vs accuracy, I use the 8B, or 32B variants.

[–] catdog@lemmy.ml -5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

"According to Chinese newspaper, US tech firms can't afford the dollar costs and prefer paying in IP"(intellectual property)

edit: FYI source of Yahoo for this article is the South China Morning Post.

[–] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 5 points 7 hours ago

that's good to know, i much rather get my news from a reliable source than from a western propaganda one.

[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml -2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

Deepseek is definitely worse than the best ChatGPT and Anthropic models. It's especially evident in coding tasks, but it is also worse with hallucinations and reasoning generally, in my experience. But for basic language tasks or pointing me to research on a topic, it's pretty good.

I just don't see it unseating the big american firms without an additional push.

[–] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I think V4 is comparable to Claude when it comes to coding, but it hasn't been shipped to the web version yet.

[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 hours ago

Oh nice. I may have to try it out

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 10 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of that has little to do with model capability and comes down to coding harnesses not meeting the expectations of the model. Here's a great discussion regarding that https://xcancel.com/MrAhmadAwais/status/2050956678502420612

DeepSeek team is aware of the tooling gap and now they're working on their own harness to close it https://deepseekv4pro.com/news/deepseek-code-harness-team-claude-code-rival-report

[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 8 points 14 hours ago

Whoa cool. Thanks for the info