this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
340 points (93.8% liked)

Showerthoughts

42362 readers
1480 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] callouscomic@lemmy.zip 3 points 43 minutes ago

Is this r/im14andthisisdeep from 2011?

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 11 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Cheat codes were a byproduct of flimsier game development standards.

Main reason why game development times inflated so much were due to today's gamers have higher standards when it comes to balancing. Some indies even have to rely on volunteer testers, just so they don't get bomb threats from Asmonfan1488 due to not all weapons were perfectly balanced.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 2 points 9 minutes ago

actually i think the standards have lowered, because there is an expectation that if a game is unbalanced, it will be fixed via a patch.

in the past if a game was going to be unbalanced it would always be unbalanced, and so the pressures were higher to get it right the first time.

its problem better to assume that the arms race in graphics and features is more to blame. yet with all that extra time and money indie games still rise above.

cheat code prevalence is fad that comes and goes.

[–] trem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 hour ago

Which I really hate, by the way. What even is the point in trying out different weapons, if you can't find one that's just stupidly overpowered?

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 2 points 30 minutes ago (1 children)

No longer produced, not removed from existing content. Very few games have cheat codes now. Only thing I can think of is Lego games via code, and even those cheats are available through progress in the game.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 1 points 7 minutes ago

I wonder if GTA 6 will have cheat codes. They've been a big part of that franchise forever

[–] BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

A lot of cheat codes were back in yonder days for testers and Q&A. Need to check something on stage 9, instead of playing through the game use the code to jump there to test. Got stuck but need to test further, noclip to go through terrain then test again for replication purposes. They weren't intended for us but were a very nice and welcome addition. Now they don't have extensive Q&A anymore to need such.

[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 13 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Also journalists, many of whom didn't grow up with videogames.

Difficulty used to be seen as a way to adjust the play time, which was tied to the value proposition for the customer. A lot of older games used to have a gigantic difficulty spike 3 or 4 levels in specifically for rental markets. The Lion King and Battletoads are famous examples. The idea is you get the players hooked with a couple of reasonably challenging levels, then put in a wall that eats up the whole weekend they rented the game for so they want to rent it again next weekend to try to get past it.

If you give journalists cheat codes then they can go and get screenshots of the later levels and write about how cool they are, further incentivizing players to keep renting or jjsy buy the game outright and push past.

Didn't consider it from that angle, I just know a lot of times it was Q&A testing tools.

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

So you'd go buy it.

They didn't make any money if you rented it twice or 1000 times. If you finished the game in a weekend you'd never go buy it.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago

Yeah they fired all of qa now the engineers test their own code and everything is shitty

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Also end game special objects.

Sometimes when you beat a game you get a special skin or object for a rerun.

Nowadays that's a preorder-dlc.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 29 minutes ago* (last edited 29 minutes ago)

Or worse, its a super hard to gain item.. and after the first few people spend months earning it, which increases demand via jealousy and envy, THEN they release a paid dlc of the same damn thing with a different name, that the credit card warriors can purchase and have immediately.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 14 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (3 children)

I just ordered an amiibo emulator off AliExpress.

My wife is like "isn't that cheating" and I'm like "yeah, but it's pay-to-play, so I'm okay with that".

It's less cheating than a game genie...

[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 19 minutes ago

Cool! Always wondered if a fun solution were ever found for the Monster Rancher PS games where you'd put arbitrary CDs/DVDs in to see what monster was generated.

[–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 7 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Can't a phone with NFC and an app send any Amiibo's signal? I'm pretty sure I've done that before.

[–] Overwrite7445@lemmy.ca 2 points 30 minutes ago

Not sure if the phone can emulate being an NFC tag, but it can program the NTAG215 stickers used by amiibo

[–] popekingjoe@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

Yes. Some phones can even be used to make NFC tags. You can buy blank tags and grab bin files and write them. I have tags for max level Wolf Link and Majora's Mask items for BoTW.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I bought blank NFC tokens that you can flash any amibo to from your phone via an app. Worked great raining down chests of meat on links head in BOTW lol.

[–] Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 hours ago

The skins and p2w shit you get from micro transactions aren't a fraction as cool as DK mode in Goldeneye or BIGDADDY in AoE.

[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

The most devious of their schemes are the "skip the grind" kind of micro transactions. The sleaziness of making your game a slog just so you can sell the solution to the problem they created is diabolical.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

The rich kid solution. Just SMH when I play against some super-low level player with all the skins and kit that normally take months to acquire - if they can even be earned in the first place, some items are cash only. Usually huge tryhards too with other “skill assists”.

[–] Absolute_Slayer@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

I remember star wars battlefront 2, which was remastered a few years ago, was the first game where I saw paid progression and loot boxes.

[–] Miller@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This is the triumph of short-termism, they are urinating in their water supply, people will just stop playing. There are just so many other things to do, training people to hate games is probably bad practice for game manufacturers.

[–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

people will just stop playing

Not from what I've seen, sadly.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 27 minutes ago

Lots do, but credit card warriors tend to be more active since they have FOMO and the whole idea of "I paid for all this, I'm losing money if I dont play!"

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 23 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (9 children)

No, they removed them because ~console dev modes were easier and more flexible to use. Cheat codes mostly just existed for testing purposes, with the occasional silly one thrown in just because.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 43 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I haven't really seen this trend like... at all. Even Assassin's Creed style games where you can buy XP packs or certain items or whatever is not really the equivalent of old timey cheat codes.

If anything I would probably argue the introduction of online Achievements probably halted the prevalence of cheat codes.

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I credit that to the rise of the subscription model. Why sell an item that gives infinite xp or unlocks all the items like an old-fashioned cheat code when you can instead sell a bunch of items that only give some xp or one item?

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I mean, I don't think so personally. Like I said, we haven't really seen any type of throughline of cheat codes being replaced by the equivalent effect but in microtransactions. There are tons of games out there with absolutely zero microtransactions and yet still no cheat codes. If some companies were replacing cheat codes with MTX it would follow that at least some of the vast plethora of other developers that don't use microtransactions still include fun old school style cheat codes in their games. But that isn't the case. What is the case is that more or less no game full stop has cheat codes anymore. But what do they all have? Achievements.

I get that microtransactions suck and I do hate them too but I don't think we can just blindly blame everything on them.

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

True. I don't agree that they were specifically removed to be replaced with microtransactions. They were removed because games gradually added online features like multiplayer or achievements to the point where very few are exclusively personal experiences where cheating can be isolated to the individual and not affect anyone else. But at the same time, I don't think they'd ever bring cheats back even if they didn't mess with online play, because they could sell them back to us piecemeal instead.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 1 points 3 hours ago

It's also just like... gaming is different now and the culture is different. Games take themselves more seriously in ways they didn't use to in say the late nineties/early aughts. There was a whimsical air to early games where you know, it wasn't a big deal if you used cheat codes, you were just having fun by yourself at your PC. These days games are to a much further extent curated experiences that take themselves seriously and where it's important to get the full "artistic vision".

Also in the pre-internet times it was often a benefit to have secret stuff like cheat codes to generate buzz. I'm reusing an example from elsewhere in this thread but it was good word of mouth at the school/work place to have people spread the word about neat things like the Big Daddy car in Age of Empires or whatever. These days you could just find it with a quick search, and the magic and appeal of that kind of stuff is gone.

And again I want to pushback on the MTX angle a bit simply because we are still far from being at a stage where every game has them, even AAA games. Hell, if anything the GAAS and MTX wave seem to be abating. I would be much more on board with your argument if microtransactions were absolutely omnipresent, but we're not there at all, even in the AAA space. And I could absolutely see a retro-themed indie single player game add some old school cheat codes, I actually think at this point it would be a pretty solid marketing trick.

[–] fartsparkles@lemmy.world 81 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (5 children)

It’s more likely because cheat codes were development / QA tools to make testing the game easier. They got left in because they were behind hidden, strange button sequences etc, removing the code risked breaking something that would be harder to test without the codes, and they can be fun.

With better development tools, debuggers/profilers, and easier ways to distribute builds, they stopped being left in the game. And with the gamification from achievements/trophies, cheats would devalue/trivialise unlocking achievements etc and break their purpose.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 5 points 4 hours ago

Also some of the creative and fun codes that did things like altering models in a comical way orreplaceing gunfire with cows mooing just aren't added as part of development anymore.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 42 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

cheat codes were development / QA tools to make testing the game easier. They got left in because they were behind hidden, strange button sequences etc, removing the code risked breaking something that would be harder to test without the codes, and they can be fun.

That's maybe how they started, but between then and now was a time when developers would very specifically add in cheat codes that had nothing to do with development or debugging, and were often just extra things added in to make the game more fun to play. (See 'paintball mode' in Goldeneye N64 for a prime example of that.) But those kinds of cheat codes seem to have fallen out of fashion.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Most cheat codes of the past were literally just shortcuts for QA and other testing. They don't need them now so they don't program them in. Though if it's on PC and has a command console, they do still have ways of using it to cheat. I do hate when an Unreal Engine game disables the console entirely, tho. I know it has one, and a lot of commands are the same across all games on it. I even found it interesting that the Oblivion Remaster uses Unreal's command console, but all the original GameBryo commands work. Even Ref and ItemIDs are identical.😃

[–] remon@ani.social 23 points 9 hours ago (6 children)

I'm not aware of any game where you can buy literal cheat codes, though.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] boletus@sh.itjust.works 18 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Most cheat codes got removed because game devs got better at separating debug tooling from game logic, but especially because publishers and console verification are very strict about what games are allowed to ship with. Shipping with debug tooling is one of the easiest ways to fail validation.

[–] thenoirwolfess@fedinsfw.app 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Publishers are always the biggest cunts in the entertainment industry. Personnel managers, record labels, game publishers, book publishers, movie distributors. Of course they'd do their best to remove fun from the entertainment.

[–] boletus@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Depends on the publisher, but unfortunately there's enough grubby publishers out there that the word is associated with bad execs. I automatically assume a publisher is unethical unless they prove otherwise. Even annapurna showed their true colours eventually.

That said, I have seen multiple instances of publishers actually saving games by stepping in and putting their own devs into the process. One example would be Valve, with left 4 dead.

load more comments
view more: next ›