this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
138 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15989 readers
2 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://ma.fellr.net/@fell/111504811722666890


Text from image:

You won't like hearing this, but video games must become more expensive. When I was little, my dad got me a PlayStation 2 for christmas, but without any games. My mum was very generous and took me out to pick two games for it. They were 60€ each. Nowadays you would call those full-price games. But now, 20 years later, a full-price game is still about 60€. If you correct that for inflation, it should really be 86€ now. And that's not even covering the fact that games have massively increased in visual fidelity, which is much more expensive to produce. If you don't want games to be littered with microtransactions or ads, then you have to accept that a regular video game must be at least 90€. (98 USD, 77 GBP, 149 AUD, 134 CAD) #Gaming #GameDev #GameDevelopment #Steam #Inflation #Economy #PlayStation


Can't wait to buy the next installment of insert sports game here/call of duty for 100 USD base, 200 for the dlc, maybe even 300 for the ultimate deluxe extreme version.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

i have ultra broke friends that will scrape and scrounge to upgrade video cards so they can play really pretty looking games at launch and they're always trying to get me to upgrade my shit so i can be part of the spectacle. we're all well into our 40s now and playing some new game on the highest settings just doesn't improve my quality of life the way that it did when i was in my early 20s. if i'm gonna drop some hundos on something now, it's gonna be like shelving or tools to make my life easier. there are so many enjoyable games that are run like a dream on a 5+ year old video card.

trying to stay on top of all the latest is rich people shit and it's wild to me how many not-rich people get sucked onto the treadmill.

[–] frauddogg@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 years ago

Another problem with fighting games: as soon as the newest iteration comes out, the queues for the prior absolutely vanish.

[–] DrCrustacean@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

My 10 year old computer runs Hades and Baba Is You just fine. There is literally no reason for me to "upgrade"

[–] TheFinalCapitalist@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago

The only reason I want to upgrade my 8+ year old rig is so I can play rimworld and factorio with an absurd amount of mods without crashing or 40m loading times. But I can't afford it so I just suffer them

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Saoirse@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago

Cool, still gonna steal em.

[–] jimmyjazx@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago

Makes sense to me, Fortnite is so good because of the shocking and embarrassing amount I've spent on it

[–] Utter_Karate@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago

Don't worry, if I don't like hearing it I'll simply choose not to listen to you. And if I don't like paying whatever the prize should be I'll simply not do that either.

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago

More games are sold now than twenty years ago, more DLCs are sold now than twenty years ago, advancement in computer technology has made production overhead cheaper, most games are sold digitally which makes production costs even cheaper, programmers are not unionized and constantly overworked, and people will not buy baseline games approaching 100 dollars

[–] Adkml@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago

This is a really good point since videogames are a niche interest with high original development costs.

Not like companies are charging $70 for the same shit every year and you don't even get a physical copy of it anymore.

[–] CantaloupeAss@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago
[–] WholeEnchilada@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago

What irks me is that the people who are willing to pay higher prices for commodities with weak rationales / illogical arguments are sometimes the same ones who think it's OK for people to starve to death because they're poor and would never dream of permitting health care to be universal because it means higher income tax. Lots of "little people" are perfectly content remaining "little" and giving their money away to the "big boys" who already have the big money.

[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago

LOL, LIMEWIRE

[–] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago

Wouldn't that just drive people to pirate more?

[–] FortifiedAttack@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago

Given that games are like the ultimate luxury product, I really couldn't care less if the treat-addicted gamer piggies have to pay more. What I do care about is developers being compensated fairly for their work.

My hope is that it would allow Independent developers to actually sell their products at a fair price, since there seems to be the implicit expectation that they can't cost more than $20, despite often being better than comparable AAA products.

Not to mention that the market is much smaller for Indie games so they end up suffering twice.

[–] mar_k@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

My only point of reference is growing up with the Wii in the early 2010s, games were like $50 at most and now basically all the major titles on the Switch are $60, despite the Switch not really being a huge upgrade tech wise (at least compared to like the PS3 vs PS5, always played Skyrim at my friend's house and the graphics were nothing compared to games like Elden Ring)

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›