1764
submitted 11 months ago by kpw@kbin.social to c/technology@lemmy.world

The ability to change features, prices, and availability of things you've already paid for is a powerful temptation to corporations.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] theherk@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

Heads up! Plex media server with the Plex clients on all your devices is such a smooth experience. Highly recommended. And their “Watch together” feature is so nice for people that prefer to stay in bed and spend the winter binge watching next to a warm body.

[-] aniki@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago

Heads up! Plex is garbage and enshitefying their own services to make more money.

[-] ironeagl@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 months ago

Heads up! Jellyfin is a great alternative!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
[-] yum_burnt_toast@reddthat.com 13 points 11 months ago

the way i see it, on big budget productions anyone who is relying on their paycheck to survive already got paid for their work, and the ones collecting royalties or sales percentages are rich enough that i couldnt care less. smaller independent studios or individual creators are the ones that i will always support, and in cases like itch.io games that are pwyw i will take the free download and figure out how much i will pay based on how much i like the game.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Copernican@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

If this rhetoric was used in a conservative opinion piece instead of a pro piracy opinion piece, I'm pretty sure it would be banned for calling for violence towards specific individuals.

Guillotine preview image and quotes like:

Sure, Zaslav deserves to be staked out over an anthill and slathered in high-fructose corn syrup. But save the next anthill for the Sony exec who shipped a product that would let Zaslav come into your home and rob you. That piece of shit knew what they were doing and they did it anyway. Fuck them. Sideways. With a brick.

Sure, Warner is an unbelievably shitty company run by the single most guillotineable executive in all of Southern California, the loathsome David Zaslav, who oversaw the merger of Warner with Discovery.

What a trash article and site. How is this permitted.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

What does that even mean?

Ownership is compromised a bundle of rights. If it's your bundle, you can split them up however you want, sell whatever kind of limited or unlimited licenses that can come up with, and this applies to real, personal, and intellectual property.

If it's not theft, why does the greed and unfair practices of the industry matter? Why does there need to be any justification or excuse?

Should definitely have a right to repai; with any other property right you generally have a duty to maintain the access to your interest. I recently unlocked a bunch of premium features in my car. HD radio, comfort window roll down (rolls down 2" with a tap") auto tailgate close (had auto open, but not close, had to hit a button on the lid to close), auto side mirror tilt down in reverse, roll down windows from keyless entry, close tailgate from keyless entry.

If I understand the interface at all, it's pretty openly accessible (if you have the right OBDii port adapter and software, which ironically you need to buy a license for). Code looked fairly straightforward, and by that I mean it looked like other computer code I've seen. Wonder what the original price was for those extras were from the dealership, probably over 10k.

[-] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 18 points 11 months ago

I recently unlocked a bunch of premium features in my car. HD radio, comfort window roll down (rolls down 2" with a tap") auto tailgate close (had auto open, but not close, had to hit a button on the lid to close), auto side mirror tilt down in reverse, roll down windows from keyless entry, close tailgate from keyless entry.

Those "features" are all so pointless they're bordering on absurd.

Thanks for reaffirming my bias that new cars suck.

[-] JollyG@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

Thanks for reaffirming my bias that new cars suck.

I am really concerned the next car I need to buy, which is probably 20 years off, is going to be this trend cranked to 11. With software and hardware I can find alternatives and hack my way around the "you paid for it, but we own it and can do whatever we want to it" mentality that tech companies push, but cars seem like a whole different world when it comes to the "you paid for it, but we own it" mentality.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

If it’s not theft, why does the greed and unfair practices of the industry matter?

Because it tears at the fabric of Humanity. It's a 'death by a thousand cuts'.

Humanity constantly needing to be on guard and pushing back against being taken advantage of by people who want to charge them multiple times for the same thing in different ways, especially the ones that used to be free, over and over again.

Fighting that is pushing back against unfairness, which is one of the root beliefs of Humanity.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2023
1764 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

59710 readers
1934 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS