133arc585

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] 133arc585@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (14 children)

You didn't answer what I asked.

You said that capitalism by definition leads to imperialism. I asked how socialism by definition precludes imperialism.

[–] 133arc585@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (17 children)

China is a socialist state so by definition cannot be

Can you elaborate on that? I agree that China is not imperialist, but I don't see how socialism by definition precludes that possibility.

[–] 133arc585@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

If you truly think this is a display of Russian aggression I genuinely doubt that you have any historic view on the geopolitics of the region. The conflict did not appear out of thin air in 2022. The situation is more complex than "Russian aggression"; in fact that's not even a part of the picture. Russia is responding to requests for assistance after Ukraine began bombing its own people in 2014. Many of these people voted to join Russia after this disgusting display by Ukraine. Before 2022 most of the combatants against Ukraine were regular people fighting for their homes and families. These people realize that Ukraine wants to bomb their homes and Russia is offering to fight alongside them. On the weekend before the SMO began, there were 2000 ceasefire violations in the Donbass. Between 2014 and 2022, 1 million Ukrainians immigrated to Russia because of the abuse by the Ukrainian government. And since the operation began in 2022, another 1.3 million immigrated. The people in these territories that Ukraine has zero regard for view the support they are receiving from Russia positively: they invited Russia in to assist them, and they are somewhat reliant on Russia to protect them from Ukraine.

I know life is a lot easier when you don't muddy things with context. I know that it's a lot easier to be righteous in your condemnation of a world power because they're "evil" and an "aggressor" than it is to acknowledge that the situation is more complex. I know that it's a lot easier to go along with what Western media says than to be informed and hold your own opinions. I know it feels nice to rally with everyone against a perceived enemy. I know it feels nice to feel that your country (and military) is finally doing something good for once. But you can't let wanting to feel good stand in the way of reality. The Western media has done a hell of a job propagandizing this war, attempting to remove any historical and geopolitical context, in order to gather and maintain support. Think honestly: how much historical and geopolitical context have you seen, especially from popular media sources? How much more effort is spent on raging about current "evil deeds" than understanding the desires of the people in the actual territories that have asked Russia for help?

Please read, and inform yourself. Life is less black-and-white than "Russia evil".

[–] 133arc585@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

So what's the conclusion as to what's happening?

As I wrote about in a thread a couple weeks back (here, here, and here), this should have been fine, and was fine on paper.

According to official statements it was going to be diluted, before release, to a level that was even lower than what Fukushima NPP put out while operational. Then it was going to be released at a rate that maintained this concentration.

Did Japan lie? Did it not dilute how it said it would? Was it a technical failure and dilution did not occur at the level they said it would, or was it released too fast at the dilution level they set? Was there not testing at release time/site?

[–] 133arc585@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Olga is glad that Russia has intervened in the conflict, and she indeed corrected me when I once referred to the Russian SMO as an “invasion”, telling me that Russia did not invade. Rather, they were invited and welcomed in. That does seem to be the prevailing view in Donetsk as far as I can tell.

Russia, Donbass, and the reality of the conflict in Ukraine

[–] 133arc585@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] 133arc585@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The OP put a non-paywalled link in the post body.

[–] 133arc585@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago

It is disturbing how righteous you feel in your ignorance.

[–] 133arc585@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If France does that we will beat their ass.

I wish I could say this response is surprising, but it's really not. When you can't win by diplomacy, reasoning, and discussion, and when you feel that you have the right to punish other countries for being sovereign, you resort to force and "beat their ass".

Do you believe France is sovereign, can make their own decisions, and can act in their own best interest, and are fully competent and able to do so? Or do you not believe they have the right to be sovereign and you (whoever "we" is) have the right to force them to align with your interests? If they end up in any agreement with China, it was their own decision and they did so because it benefits them in some way; do you feel you are permitted to punish them for that?

[–] 133arc585@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Every day:

Every other day:

  • student loan relief shot down
  • budget accountability shot down
  • tax enforcement on top income earners shot down
  • funding to medicare slashed
  • funding for food assistance programs slashed
  • funding for school lunch programs slashed
  • funding for public schooling slashed
  • union strikes shut down
  • tax relief and subsidies increased for most profitable companies
  • tax relief for most wealthy individuals
  • funding for clean water programs slashed

I try not to view government spending as zero-sum because there's no saying that not spending money on X means that money automatically gets spent on Y. But the government's priorities could not be more clear: its citizens (and common citizens of the world) are not of any concern.

[–] 133arc585@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago

Posts show when they were posted. This one was posted on May 24th, 2022.

view more: ‹ prev next ›