Chippys_mittens

joined 5 months ago
[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 1 points 13 minutes ago* (last edited 11 minutes ago)

I'm not sure what you're asking.

Would this photo be equally disrespectful/offensive?

What about shopping Shane Gillis's face onto Tom Aspinalls?

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 1 points 20 minutes ago* (last edited 14 minutes ago) (2 children)

It would be silly if you posted a picture of me with crazy proportions online. You're trolling.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 1 points 42 minutes ago

Ladies and gentlemen, HE'S DONE IT

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 2 points 54 minutes ago* (last edited 47 minutes ago) (4 children)

Yes, that would be silly. I can't tell if you're trolling or this out of touch. You're choosing to be offended and extremely fragile. Do you genuinely believe if the actress saw this exact meme she would gasp, mouth agape and tears welling in her eyes from pain/embarrassment? Or, do you think she'd chuckle and say "oh thats silly". Because if you think its the former, as your stance seems to be, you are trolling or completely out of touch with being a human, less time online.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 20 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

The american dragon ?

Edit- that was Jake long my bad yall

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 14 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (8 children)

How so? Do you consider yourself to have a sense of humor? Can you delineate between comedic and ill intentioned? Because, to me, it feels like you're choosing to pearl clutch over a silly meme. You're really putting the BOOOOO in boob right now.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago (11 children)

What do you mean ?

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 32 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

I felt attacked when yours was a single minute after mine haha

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 28 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Queen of Queens

 
[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

Where you at China supporters?

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 14 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

If the majority of your interactions with the world are through the internet, yes. If the majority of your interactions and in person, nah, shit is the same it's always been.

 
 
 

Im definitely on the side that over using AI and using it commercially seems to be bad. On the other hand, it seems like a tech that has huge potential upsides. I'm not sure we can achieve a post scarcity society with all labor being done by humans. This is where I see AI becoming a massive tool. Assuming we can pair it with mechanical means of work, not strictly digital. I know it's a touchy subject but I want to hear your opinion. As always, if you're just going to tell me to read more, recommend literature.

 

I feel like bears is the most obvious answer. In this scenario it would have started thousands of years ago. We'd have dozens/hundreds of breeds with different shapes,sizes and characteristics. What do you think would be the most interesting/cool?

 

To me, it feels like a further step in advancing human civilization. Disperse the population a bit and keep growing as a species. That said, I'm no expert and if you have literature to recommend please do!

 
 
 
 

If it's coffee/tea, how do you take it? I typically end up consuming 200-400 Mg a day depending on if I go to the gym or work overnight. I either do black coffee (iced ideally) or sugar free redbull/monster. I'm considering switching to caffeine pills but I know it wont scratch that habitual itch of drinking it down.

 
 

In my head libertarians are the right and anarchists are the left but they are similar in ideals (little to no government intervention). At least in the sense that if you talk to a libertarian I feel they tend to sound socially right and an anarchist tends to sound socially left. I have no idea if this makes sense at all. If you're going to tell me to read more, sure, recommend some literature though.

view more: next ›