DecorativeTarp

Might’ve missed this with my edit timing:

This snarky comment is the one that actually shows what you need in full though.

Nah, have too much on my plate. Just saw this pop up while browsing hot, and it’s a common design pattern without an obvious solution.

This snarky comment is the one that actually shows what you need in full though.

You can set the grid item to display: flex, they’re not totally mutually exclusive (one can be within the other). Kinda hard to blindly walk through stuff like this without seeing the HTML/CSS though.

One of those cases where browser dev tools are your friend as it should only need a few properties, you can poke and prod to see how they land, and you can see whether you’re getting a 100% height fill on the parent.

This is largely a flexbox question:

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/31000885/align-an-element-to-bottom-with-flexbox

Have to make sure the parent element of the text and buttons is set to an appropriate display:flex and is also taking up the full height of the grid item though (if it’s not just the grid item itself).

Definitely call it change in Ohio, rest must be right.

This is thoroughly misleading. There’s no apples to apples comparison here, and they’ve instead just found that people are less likely to buy low-effort slop games.

Critical mass on any social media platform turns it into a shitshow?

I was giggling at just the 📝 reply when I originally saw the thread.