Endymion_Mallorn

Then... we only use the versions that work. And someone can fork from there.

Basically what this person said, yes. Donors like stability. Removal and rapid death penalties are unstable.

If they weren't authoritarians, they wouldn't be working for an enforcement agency of the government. They don't need to be true believers to be on a side.

My employer stops paying, I stop working. Simple as. Quit and hope someone will employ an unrepentant authoritarian.

Not just Dems. Dems who aren't afraid of the establishment and are willing to burn the donors.

We need to find a way to get this bastard and his admin removed for treason.

If you lived three or four centuries ago, you'd be burned at the stake as a demon, just for coming up with that.

I haven't been in a Chili's in forever, and I don't expect to go again. So I'm going to avoid everything from Brinker International [NYSE: EAT] now (Chili's and Maggiano's Little Italy), and I'm thinking that I might sell some of it short too.

I don't want to know what an Altoona-style hot dog would look like.

Right, so before we see solar take hold, it needs to be illegal for a property owner to own the panels, and the power company has the right to put them anywhere they like.

What do the lobbyists get out of the solar panels? How do the solar panels generate constant fees?