Ensign_Crab

joined 2 years ago
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Nevertheless, fuck Lars.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 42 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

especially your own code.

"This is obvious" I said. "Surely I won't need to comment this," I said.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I admitted I could be wrong in my initial comment, if you'll recall.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Can't wait to see how you handle rejection, considering how you handle advice.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (5 children)

I’m gonna be real, I’m going to continue making fun of these ridiculous assumptions whether you like it or not, get used to it or block me I guess.

Glad to see you found a hobby, I suppose.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Pile the dead Palestinian bodies higher king

Things centrists say when they masturbate.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

And what exactly do you imagine that I need to answer for?

I already know what you don't want anyone to ever have to answer for.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago (7 children)

Already have a few. It's how I met my wife.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

All you have to do to defeat that is to fucking vote.

And in places where the party's fuckery succeeds, you'll pretend that the primaries are fair because you like the results.

Yeah, there was talk about them rigging the 2016 primary for Clinton with the superdelegates if Bernie was ahead, but it never reached that point because Clinton secured the nomination before the convention.

The party successfully argued in court that it could decide the nominee in a smoke filled room without the input of the voters if it wanted. Then it did just that in 2024. And you pretend it was fair because a genocide candidate was nominated.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

I hope one day that democrats will regard their voters as humans with agency.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

Why are we saying that Mamdani getting funds from the state is a bad thing?

The wing of the party that expects us to buy that the biden administration kept its promises by announcing its intent to keep their promises won't accept that balancing a budget is balancing a budget.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

The party's outreach to younger voters so far has been "you don't vote so we're going to ignore you."

 

Democratic Sens. Richard Durbin (Ill.), Catherine Cortez Masto (Nev.), John Fetterman (D-Pa.), Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.), Maggie Hassan (N.H.), Gary Peters (Mich.), Jeanne Shaheen (N.H.) and Brian Schatz (Hawaii) (Nev.) all voted "yes" in addition to Schumer, — as did Maine's Angus King, an Independent who caucuses with Democrats.

 

In each of the separate lawsuits state regulators filed, dozens of internal communications, documents and research data were redacted — blacked-out from public view — since authorities entered into confidentiality agreements with TikTok.

But in one of the lawsuits, filed by the Kentucky Attorney General’s Office, the redactions were faulty. This was revealed when Kentucky Public Radio copied-and-pasted excerpts of the redacted material, bringing to light some 30 pages of documents that had been kept secret.

 

The stars at night are big and bright.

view more: next ›