And it still manages to suck anyways!
Fiery
joined 7 months ago
There aren't a lot of posts for sure, but there sure are some.... Maybe check if your instance is defederated from .ml
To be fair, that's on the saner side on the scale of antivaxers. As in if you don't want to put "very dangerous unknown substances" into your body but still be safe you need as many vaccinated people as possible.
How can everyone on a private tracker maintain seed ratios above 1? Is it mathematically impossible?
You seem to be talking about a completely different thing than the comment you replied to. The commenter above was talking about long-term seeding being incentivized by the tracker (it helps with keeping torrents alive). While you seem to be talking about short-term seeding. A month is not a long time.
Not every tracker gives bonus points (aka BON aka karma) the same way. I advise you look for one that fits your needs and use it instead of the one you're complaining about. (Some examples of what sites use for BON: torrent size, torrent age, seeding time, remaining seeders, total seedpool)
It's a computer (Artificial) making a choice that is better than random (Intelligence)
What it is not is a LLM (aka chatbot). It isn't even any type of neural network. Does not make it any less AI though
The next time they try it's gonna be against terrorism. For sure that time it'll pass.
Obtainium has a toggle to set the install source to Google Play. It uses shizuku
To be fair, not allowing the user to remove an indicator that something could be tracking them is probably not the worst idea. Otherwise it'd be too easy for someone to install an app like that and hide it.
So you agree that you think parents should be allowed to kill their children as an expression of their freedom.
Now I'm curious where you draw the line? Anyways now that we've cleared that up I'm blocking the hell out of you cuz... Yikes
Sure it's kind of a crazy example... But it is not as ridiculously far removed as you think from parents choosing to let their kids die of preventable diseases.
It really just comes down to the fact that you think it's a part of the parents freedom to withhold something that could prevent their child's needless death at no cost.
So parents should be allowed to kill their kids?
Like in the example a parent is free to decide for a child that food is bad for them, and even when the child dies of starvation it is no problem because it should be seen as an expression of the parents freedom to choose to do so?
My last job (this year) is still actively developing in VFP. Yeah