[-] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Because there's no "wrong" answer in an experiment. AKA no accountability.

[-] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I still have hope... just not for America. I can make somewhere else better.

[-] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

'Decline to answer' is a valid option for those people and they don't get included in these polls.

You're making speculations as to why they voted the way they said they did, but that's unknowable. Your guess is just as good as mine, which is why it's rude to assume yours is the right guess.

[-] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago

So, you don't trust any poll where people self-report the information?

You don't mean that. You're just saying that in order to maintain your standing in your community.

.. see how rude that is to just assume people are lying about themselves as if you know better?

[-] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Exit polls - voluntary responders only

[-] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Exactly. They're DEALING WITH the far right. They haven't just handed they keys to the country over.

There's still a chance for them.

[-] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Yeah, and they act like learning about a new skin cream on the street is going to be subjected to the same level of scrutiny as learning about a new study on "gun bans", even though people have been studying this for decades and the results largely don't change, only the public perception of them.

It's like if they showed people a new study for "Earth gravity" vs "Moon gravity" and act surprised when people don't immediately catch on when their numbers say the moon makes you weigh more. You wouldn't be expecting that result OR trust a random person on the street to change your view of gravity with a chart of 4 numbers.

Yes, they found bias. Cool.

[-] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Alternate title: A single "study" presented from someone on the street is typically not enough to change anyone's perspective on a subject, especially if that "study" presents "facts" that are contradictory to the listener's previous knowledge.

Humans aren't rational. Humans are rationalizing. If someone on the street giving you a basic chart with 4 numbers on it is enough to change your mind, you likely didn't have much of an opinion to begin with.

[-] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 280 points 4 months ago

I remember reading that when national parks tried to make a 'bear-proof' trashcan, they found that there was a larger overlap between the smartest bear and the stupidest human to make a viable product.

I feel like it's a similar situation here. The smartest kid and the stupidest adult are far more similar than we'd like to admit.

[-] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 162 points 5 months ago

I remember the first time I went to an anime convention, and was SO EXCITED because they were going to host a DDR tournament!

Then I went into the room where the tournament was supposed to be held and almost died. They were routinely shutting down the room just to try to air it out, and were doing routine announcements of "I do not care if you think you do not smell. Everyone needs to go back to their hotel and shower before coming back. We are serious."

I didn't enter the tournament.

[-] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 133 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

She was dropping her son off as school. Her son was still in the car. She drove into the bus lane accidentally. The officer's response was that he was "scared she was going to run someone over" .. while her son who goes to the school is in the car. You could verify that in a 5 second radio call to the front office.

We need to re-think policing in general if cops are allowed to enforce their worst fears instead of seeing what's actually happening.

[-] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 132 points 9 months ago

If "your man card can be revoked" then you understand that gender is performative and conditional.

view more: next ›

IzzyScissor

joined 1 year ago