Jiggle_Physics

Unfortunately, my experience with social media has been that a lot of the most visible posters often are touchy, and can be a little domineering where they can. I look at his history posts, like the art ones, etc. However, unless I specifically have something to say that fully within the confines of the subject, and not negative, I will not post. In other spaces I block them. This isn't necessarily PJ I am talking about either, this is a broader thing with these platforms. It is what it is I guess.

any time you use a pan to cook meat throw some onions, or whatever in with a little more oil, get them going, pour in wine, and cook till thick. ad a couple pates of butter to finish for extra gloss and richness, season to taste, serve

To me? Nothing. However I have seen many people post getting bans from them for super petty reasons, like downvoting a post.I have also seen this person be a point of contention a few times in some more shitposty places. So I just tend to avoid commenting on anything they post.

Ugh, Pugjesus, no surprises here

Yeah, I wasn't trying to bash on your filling, I put whatever in tortillas, just commented on the terminology. I was just mildly confused by it, I didn't mean to offend you, but I came off as being to pedantic.

As like an introduction to the history of it yes, however, if they are not well acquainted with the genre, I personally would start with something further down the list, something a little easier to digest than TG.

I still go to the recipes, and skip over the fluff. I have found numerous errors in AI summaries of recipes when they are anything but very well know, common, ones. Very well known, common to the Anglosphere that is.

I never downvoted you, I have upvoted your post.

I understand that you are showcasing the tortilla. I explained why I said what I said, and it had nothing to do with the fact that you are showcasing the tortilla, but the way you interchangeably used terminology. The oat tortilla seems interesting. I simply responded to something you said with an example of how I have done something on the subject, the oat based filling. When you replied to my comment about confusing the two, had you just said something like "yeah, I am just swapping terms loosely, as I am showcasing the tortilla" I would have never responded to that. However, your reply made it seem like you took offense to it.

Anyway, interesting tortilla, have fun

You call oat tortilla in your title, and description, then, in the comments, call it taco. So, the title seems to suggest you understand the tortilla is not what determines the taco type, but in the comments that seems to not be the case. Which, to me, made it look like you might think of the two interchangeably. This is why I said what I said, you switched between them like it is the same thing.
It seems this has offended you.

Also, I have made tacos where the core ingredient of the filling is oats, using lightly ground oats as the primary texture, and binder, for a meat substitute.

You keep saying oat taco, but the only thing that appears to possibly have oats in it is the tortilla. People don't say I had a flour taco, or a corn taco, because that is what the tortilla is made of, tacos get labeled due to their fillings, and cooking techniques.

I think you may be confusing tortilla and taco.

I too found myself not being able to really discuss books I had read that long ago. So I slowed down my reading pace. Not just how many I take in, but how much time I spend reading the books. With particularly challenging things I have always returned to them, and re-read them as my understanding of the book expands, or my perspective on things changes, however I realized I remembered them in far more detail than others, and it was because the challenge slowed me down, and forced me to spend time contemplating what it was I was reading, as I was reading it.

I enjoy reading a lot more now. I am not in university any more, I do not have to read 500 pages per day.