2 is my favourite, but I know some people bounce off of the combat hard because you've got to keep rhythm, not mash as well as all of the preparation you should do beforehand that can give you a better chance in the fight. For me though, that's why I prefer it over 3.
MrScottyTay
I thought the exact same thing!
There actually are muscles, just not many with most of the movements being derived from forearm muscles pulling on tendons
Yeah i always rate a film based on how well it does what it intends to, I'm not comparing it to my favourite film, that feels like I'd just be disappointed in 95% of all films i watch and that would such a sad life.
Don't you mean D-ecent?
Then substitute immortality with invulnerability in my comment, you still understood what I meant which is the important part of communication
Maybe he was hoping to find people who didn't know who he was so he could feel normal again
Qui Gon also accepted the idea of his own death beforehand, and some also think that through his meditation he knew that him dying was the only way that would eventually lead to Anakin being redeemed and killing the Emperor. Maybe the timeline where he survived and looked after Anakin was a worse timeline, he was also starting to get very worried about how the Jedi Order was becoming and that may also have played a role in any potential clairvoyance, with him realising that things needed to get worse for the galaxy before it could heal again properly, so the Order needed to fall.
It was also his rage that strengthened his use of the force that actually kept him alive. The legs bit just helped him get around.
I always liked his episodes in Clone Wars so I was okay with it.
I also kinda like the idea that he survived purely because of his unending rage as it potentially ties in with Palpatine explaining to Anakin that the dark side has the power to unlock immortality.
And they started to reliably vote. So now their wants and "needs" are being acted upon.
The monarchy of the commonwealth is little more than just a diplomat with a title. They may have stated power in law but because of modern conventions they never use them or intervene in any of the politics of said countries.