MrSmiley

Throughout human history, wealth inequality has been the primary driver of societal collapse.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/aug/02/self-termination-history-and-future-of-societal-collapse

Their “best” ideas do come from dystopian fiction novels.

They can name it Aktion T4

Reality is a process forever stream through time and space, patterns emerge, systems form, change, collapse. New processes, new systems, solar systems spiral, evolutionary processes flow. Society as a system, civilization as a process. More processes, more systems, processes within systems, systems within processes. Beyond beginning and end, universe and speck…

IT’S TURTLES ALL THE WAY DOWN!!!

That’s exactly what a cybernetic organism would say..

It’s just saying that real objectivity is impossible because everything is filtered through a subjective lens.

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-beast/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_dominance_theory

Historical materialism is unfalsifiable, it’s in the same category as praxeology. Junk science.

Marx version of conflict theory is similar to the claim that the sun revolves around the earth, inadequate.

The old theories are obsolete, the modes of production replaced by modes of representation. No matter how much you pray and recite your holy scripture, paradise never comes. Marxist theory is as relevant as phrenology.

Any form of socialism is not feasible without human consciousness evolving into some kind of singularity. You’ve already contradicted yourself and betrayed the principles of Marxism by claiming the proletariat would dominate the bourgeois. If socialism is about the worker owning the means of production, there is no bourgeois class, except for the worker. In the real world, all you get is some type of authoritarian state capitalism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominance_hierarchy

Ahh yes, the proletariat rules over the bourgeois, but the proletariat are not smart enough to rule, so some enlightened elite must rule for them, let me guess, you? The closet aristocrat?