[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Oh shit. I totally missed the different label on the 3 otherwise identical pictures. Now I get it. I originally thought it was just literally 3 identical pictures.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

i don't understand the comic?

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

If 80 senators decide the vote should be anonymous then it could be, right? Normally i don’t think that’d be possible but for something AIPAC hold so dear i could see it

A voice vote would provide that anonymity and may be the path the senate goes down since then the official votes aren't counted, but idk if that is paperwork that happens later.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

Too bad the vote won't happen until after the election, if it ever happens at all.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Based union. Never endorse a party of Capital.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 10 points 4 days ago

What did they actually do? I see they threw paint, but was it in the can and then it collapsed the roof? Did they cut the roof away? I'm not sure of the logistics here.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago

Dems gotta get more racist if the want to defeat trump!

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 100 points 4 months ago

Sounds like the problem here is the "government scrutiny" not steam.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 121 points 6 months ago

I doubt the US is trying to overthrow Netanyahu, but if they were, I'm glad of it.

11
submitted 9 months ago by PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml to c/green@lemmy.ml

A pretty standard pro-environmental piece, however I do appreciate how it calls out the "German Green Party," which is obviously just an astro-turfed political party funded by the coal industry.

And of course the criticism of about the farce of Carbon Capture is spot-on.

-2
submitted 10 months ago by PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml

A growing number of Senate Democrats appear open to making it harder for migrants to seek asylum in order to secure Republican support for aiding Ukraine and Israel.

This is what the democrats stand for. Unlimited funding for the MIC and border-control, but social issues are not a priority.

Stop voting for the parties of Capital.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 141 points 1 year ago

It's just too expensive to save the planet. I'm glad that our governments were making the tough Choices, to continue burning coal and other fossil fuels because the economy just couldn't handle the burden of not growing by another 5% every year.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 97 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

CO2 "offsets" have always been bullshit green washing. The only way to regulate emissions is by directly regulating emissions. Not coming up with elaborate loopholes.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 96 points 1 year ago

This is a bad chart with lots of data issues. It apparently consists of two points, 1995 and 2017. The source is some data aggregator that isn't clear, and of course the differentiation between the categories is non-existent. what is the difference between "church," "friends," or "neighbors?" What is the difference between "school" and "college."

That said obviously there are more "online" couples between 1995 where the only options were AOL or IRC chatrooms and 2017 where actual dating apps existed that were easily accessible via your phone.

My Take: I agree the internet has changed society in the past 22 years. Thanks shitty chart from reddit. I now have a greater awareness of the significance of the internet.

view more: next ›

PowerCrazy

joined 1 year ago