Rivalarrival

In summer, it takes energy to dehumidify and chill the air inside your home. You're talking about using a vent to blow conditioned air from inside your home to outside your home. Every cubic foot of air you push out of that vent is replaced by a cubic foot of outside air leaking in from the environment.

Unless you have a second vent to bring in external air to your case, isolating it from your interior air entirely, you will be burning energy in the form of lost, conditioned air. Depending on how much best you're producing and how much air you're moving, you migh use less power with the vent closed than with swapping interior and exterior air.

If I were considering this, I'd consider water cooling. Two little pipes going through the wall instead of a large vent.

There's already been at least four... Oh. Third impeachment attempt.

I was totally thinking of something else.

Judicial review is not in the US constitution at all.

You're not the first person to say this to me. I don't know where you're getting that idea. Judicial review is a direct conclusion of Article III, Section 2:

The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution,

When I take a case to the court, claiming the legislature is violating my constitutional rights, the court has to determine jurisdiction: Whether they are allowed to hear the case. Legislation purports to deny them jurisdiction over such a case; Article III specifically grants them jurisdiction over all cases.

When they conflict, Article III supersedes legislation. Here, that constitutes judicial review.

There's a state/federal argument to be made, but not a separation of powers argument. The Texas constitution has similar language. For this provision of the bill to survive, SCOTUS (Or, more accurately, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals) will have to refuse certain powers they are explicitly granted, in favor of limitations prescribed by another branch.

That provision just makes it easier to overturn the whole bill. It's an unconstitutional legislative violation of the separation of powers. They don't even have to argue the merits of the rest of the bill; they can overturn the whole thing on the basis of that single provision.

Take your upvote and choke on it.

No, but it should be.

In Mario Kart, if a player gets too far ahead of the pack, the game starts giving blue shells to other players. Blue shells track down and knockout the leading player, giving the rest a chance to catch up.

He ordered them in his first term. They are currently slated to enter into service in 2029.

Recently, the vice-chair to the DNC, David Hogg, has been running an effort to primary and remove the ineffective/establishment

Sadly, this is not true. The people he is trying to get rid of are useless, to be sure, but he's not trying to get rid of the architects of Democratic failure. He wants younger versions of the same corporate centrists responsible for the current state of the party. He idolizes people like Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton.

David Hogg is just another corporate centrist trying to maintain the status quo for another generation.

#blueshell