Showroom7561

joined 2 years ago
[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

I truly appreciate the time you took to read the studies. I respect that, however, the personal attacks are unwarranted, and you're more than welcome to debate the experts who've compiled the data, if you like.

Let's take things one at a time, but it should also be noted that much of the research cited are medicinal users of cannabis (including those prescribed by doctors), not recreational, which is what the actual OP is about. You avoided touching on any of those from the long list by the Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction.

Your first study, linked directly because it’s actually really easy to do https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8229290/

From the conclusion: “…data are not sufficiently strong to suggest that cannabis use adversely affects the progression of viral diseases…it is also evident that cannabis or its constituents, including THC and CBD, have some beneficial effects such as improving appetite and food intake in patients with HIV/AIDS and positive effects in patients with hepatic steatosis”

You conveniently left out the parts before that:

"Research suggests a link between cannabis, immune function, and viral infections. Cannabis use may be associated with adverse effects on immune function and, thereby, increase the risk of acquiring or transmitting infections such as HIV and HCV. "

The part you bring up has to do with viral progression, which is different. And the fact that more research is needed in this area (per the study), doesn't clear cannabis from harm.

The benefits of increased appetite in someone who is dying is great! Too bad, that has no relevance to the general population, so the risks outweigh the benefits.

Your second study https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7442038/

Again, direct quotes: “We have evidence suggesting that cannabis use, primarily THC in cannabis, in genetically predisposed or at-risk populations, leads to earlier diagnosis of psychosis/schizophrenia.”

That doesn't appear to be the study I linked, but we agree, increased risks.

But why did you skip the most important parts of the conclusion?

"Neuroimaging studies show the detrimental effect of cannabis on brain morphology, especially adolescent brains. "

"...there is still more harm from cannabis than benefits, and adolescent cannabis usage should be discouraged at all costs."

That's pretty damning for something considered safe, wouldn't you agree?

“Recent trials in therapeutic CBD use are showing its alleviating effect on positive symptoms of schizophrenia and its opposing effect on THC, which warrants further research.”

So not only is there no evidence of any risk of psychosis or schizophrenia for anyone who isn’t already genetically predisposed, but there’s actually evidence that specific cannabinoids in isolation can alleviate symptoms! Wow, another source betrays you

Trials... therapeutic CBD... that sounds considerably different from recreational use outside of a medical setting, no? Like the type of use they would like to see discouraged "at all costs".

Anyway, the study I linked is: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5984096/

"In summary, a genetic approach—representing an alternative to assessing causality when a randomized controlled trial would be unethical—strongly supports the hypothesis that use of cannabis is causally related to risk of schizophrenia."

Your third study https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S014976341100073X

And more direct quotes that clearly illustrate how stupid you are: “…cannabis use is clearly not an essential or sufficient risk factor as not all schizophrenic patients have used cannabis and the majority of cannabis users do not develop schizophrenia.”

This was my oversight, and I apologize for that.

That review paper was quite outdated, and the same author has a much more recent study available: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7646282/

"In conclusion, our findings confirm previous evidence of the harmful effect on mental health of daily use of cannabis, especially of high-potency types. Importantly, they indicate for the first time how cannabis use affects the incidence of psychotic disorder. Therefore, it is of public health importance to acknowledge alongside the potential medicinal properties of some cannabis constituents the potential adverse effects that are associated with daily cannabis use, especially of high-potency varieties."

I hope that covers it. There seems to be more than enough evidence to suggest that cannabis is not safe, even for being the "safest recreational drug".

Edit: grammar/spelling.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

No proof whatsoever

You didn't read any of it.

Smoking anything is bad for lung health, does nothing to change the fact that marijuana is the safest recreational substance in existence, especially when ingested in any other way.

The safest in a group of harmful things doesn't make it safe!

“May supress the immune sustem” no evidence provided lol, unsubstantiated speculation, embarassingly weak

Here's what the research says:

"The review of published research shows that cannabis use may impair immune function in many instances and thereby exerts an impact on viral infections including human immune deficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C infection (HCV), and human T-cell lymphotropic type I and II virus (HTLV-I/II)." Maggirwar SB, Khalsa JH. The Link between Cannabis Use, Immune System, and Viral Infections. Viruses. 2021;13(6):1099. Published 2021 Jun 9. doi:10.3390/v13061099

“Can increase risk of developing schizophrenia” also well documented that it has no chance whatsoever of causing schizophrenia in individuals that aren’t already hereditarily prone to developing it, at most it can accelerate onset

Again, more studies to help you:

"This adds to the substantial evidence base that has previously identified cannabis use to associate with increased risk of schizophrenia, by suggesting that the relationship is causal. Such robust evidence may inform public health messages about cannabis use, especially regarding its potential mental health consequences." Vaucher J, Keating BJ, Lasserre AM, et al. Cannabis use and risk of schizophrenia: a Mendelian randomization study. Mol Psychiatry. 2018;23(5):1287-1292. doi:10.1038/mp.2016.252

"To date, the research on the impact of its use has largely been epidemiological in nature and has consistently found that cannabis use is associated with schizophrenia outcomes later in life, even after controlling for several confounding factors." Casadio P, Fernandes C, Murray RM, Di Forti M. Cannabis use in young people: the risk for schizophrenia. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011;35(8):1779-1787. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.04.007

There are dozens more, if you need them.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 11 points 12 hours ago

Unfortunately Linux phones, including Sailfish, aren’t really fit for daily use yet, imo.

Consider this:

"Jolla’s AppSupport enables embedded Linux platforms to run Android apps seamlessly." (SOURCE)

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 28 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

No kidding. I was on a bike ride yesterday through some areas where entire subdivisions, in fairly medium/high class neighbourhoods, had no sidewalks. Retired folks were taking their nightly stroll on the side of the road. I guess kids don't get to play outside there, either.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

Oh, come on now. You are arguing in bath faith if you couldn't find one thing that "proves you wrong".

Here are just a few from that link, and each topic is explored in depth if you click through the supporting links on that page:

"Hospitalizations for psychotic disorder related to cannabis use accounted for one-third of mental or behavioural disorders between 2006–2015, increasing more than 25 per cent during this time."

"Cannabis smoke contains chemicals (toxins, carcinogens and irritants) that are known to negatively affect lung health."

"Smoking cannabis may suppress the immune system, which can make you more prone to infection from viruses."

"Regular cannabis use can increase the risk of developing psychosis and schizophrenia..."

"Cannabis impairs the cognitive and motor abilities necessary to operate a motor vehicle and doubles the risk of being involved in a collision."

"Cannabis, when inhaled, can potentially trigger stroke, heart attack or inflammation of arteries, especially in those who use cannabis heavily."

"Regular use of these products [edibles] has been associated with problematic cannabis use, cannabis use disorder and mental health disorders."

"Based on existing research and because of the associated risks of harms, cannabis use should only be considered for people who do not respond to first- and second-line treatments."

"Most of the cases of emerging lung and respiratory disorders have been linked to vaping products containing THC from cannabis extracts."

"Regular cannabis use is associated with changes in brain structure and function, including changes to the brain’s natural reward pathways."

"Regular cannabis use is generally associated with more harmful rather than beneficial effects among people with mental health conditions."

"Frequent cannabis use during pregnancy is associated with ... Altered neurodevelopment and cognition, and academic under-achievement; and behavioural disturbances among children and young adults, including attention deficits, increased hyperactivity and impulsivity, and increased likelihood of delinquency and substance use."

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 4 points 15 hours ago

A fraction of what an author makes through selling. And libraries end up selling those books after some time anyway, "ripping off" the author twice.

I think we all need to realize that there are so many things we do that could be compared to piracy, yet piracy is the one that's made to look like the worst thing you can do. It really isn't.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 12 points 16 hours ago

when in fact the current system is broken to the extent that it allows and enables it.

I'd go as far as to say that the current system rewards it.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 0 points 16 hours ago

We dropped cigarette use with a massive anti smoking campaign that lasted decades. Not by hiding it behind the counter.

We used many approaches, which should be applied to the currently promoted drugs you see being sold in stores.

How come I can’t extend your outrage to churches? Seems a reasonable expectation since we’re hiding things that destroy lives.

Churches... the building? Or religion? I'd love to organized religion die, but church buildings should stand as either historical landmarks, or repurposed to house the homeless.

Where do we start?

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 44 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

This is why wealth needs to be capped.

Billionaires should not exist, and we'll soon start to see trillionaires in the next 5 years.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 7 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Libraries, lending to a friend, donating to someone, buying used... All the same as piracy?

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca -1 points 17 hours ago (7 children)

I'm assuming then, that you aren't aware of the decades of research on cannabis, especially when smoked, showing harm in other areas of human health?

Have a read.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca -1 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

To think that you could eliminate or hide everything that offends someone from life completely is also a childish outlook.

"Everything". I never suggested such.

Look, we were able to drop cigarette use by using simple strategies like not having them displayed "in your face" at shops, and cutting advertising.

If we can't do the same for other drugs, then it's due to a lack of trying.

 

Well worth the watch, whether you know anything about Lael or not. 🥰🚲🌎

 

A few weeks back, this grocery store set out these plant racks that essentially blocked the walkway, except for a small strip running parallel to the curb (only one person at a time could pass through, as you can see).

At that time, I helped a senior lady who was using a walker to get through it, because she could have easily fallen off the curb if the wheel slipped over the edge.

So I let the store management know that it was dangerous and they needed to give people more space.

Today, I noticed that they put a skid down, completely blocking the narrow path.

This forces people to walk between the plant racks, which is even more narrow. Coupled with the fact that some of the plants are put on the ground (lazy customers??), so you actually can't pass without some major maneuvering.

Someone at the store surely must realize how bad of an idea this is. Or is doing it out of spite.

And to make matters worse, behind where this photo is taken is plenty of open space to put those plant racks. I know this because there used to be a bike rack, but it was removed and never replaced... 😡

 

Scotts shop towels (the blue rolls) are American, and that seems to be all that's sold around here, including at Canadian Tire.

Any alternatives? I already use reusable rags, buy I need something disposable and also stronger than paper towels.

 

I think Tom missed an even better option: photochromic cycling glasses.

I picked up a pair of Ryders Roam photochromic glasses when the company went out of business... $200+ glasses for like $30. Best purchase ever.

You can wear them at night, during sunny days, go from outdoor to indoor without taking them off (i.e running errands by bike), they are fairly anti-fog, sweat isn't an issue, rain isn't a problem. And I've worn them all-year-round because they offer awesome wind/cold/bug protection.

Invest in a good pair of photochromic cycling glasses and call it a day!

 

If you ride in during the summer (who doesn't???), there may be times when you're putting bug repellent spray on.

DEET-based products harm synthetic fabric, so opt for a DEET-free bug spray if you don't want any surprises.

I've used picaridin-based products, and they seem to work as good, if not better, than DEET.

 

It's infuriating to create a "strong password" with letters, numbers, upper and lowercase, symbols, and non-repeating text... but it has to be only 8 to 16 characters long.

That's not a "strong" password, random characters or not.

Is there a limitation that somehow prevents these sites from allowing more than 16 characters?

I'm talking government websites, not just forums. It seems crazy to me.

 

Inside it says that I must reply within 10 days if there are any changes to my info. Failure to do so could result in the cancellation of a medical supplies grant.

Fortunately, the info is correct, but holy hell, I can't imagine the BS that someone would have to go through if they "failed" to reply because of this delay.

 

Chrome is one of the first things I disable on my Android devices, and I hate the idea of signing up for any accounts just to access local files.

But Canon welcomed me with a big surprise, and a fuck you, too!

 

I'll gladly take the weight penalty from bringing a proper camera on my bike rides, because I'd miss too many gems with only a smartphone.

I was in a forested trail when I heard the classic osprey call, so I went looking, and found several flying around. This one was just chilling 🥰

104
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by Showroom7561@lemmy.ca to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world
 

AI generated content, which now includes incredibly convincing videos of people, will grow exponentially over the next weeks, months, and years.

At some point, the majority of the content you see will be fake, and any usefulness or connection to humans will be lost.

Even information that you might have previously been able to confirm from a trusted source can (and will) be manipulated in some way, making verification impossible.

This lack of verification, along with the speed at which fake content can now be generated, will make it impossible to defend against.

Even the world of art and communication has been tainted, serving no connection to real people through this digital hellscape.

To that end, when will the internet be so untrustworthy, “soulless”, and useless to you that it crosses the tipping point?

EDIT: Ok, holy fuck. There's actually a term for what I'm describing: "The Dead Internet Theory"

 

Lots of education to be had just by learning about how they caught this guy. Reused passwords, user names, etc.

 

"Accident".

"Accidents" of mass destruction shouldn't be downplayed because a car was involved.

And when police call it an "accident" they've already concluded that this couldn't be avoided, despite the fact that nearly every vehicle on pedestrian crash is preventable.

view more: next ›