SkyeStarfall

There are many flavors of poly, you sound like you fall into relationship anarchism/solo poly, which is pretty much what I practice, as that's what appeals the most to me.

I don't want to have a say in what my partner(s) can or cannot do, it doesn't feel right to me. I want them to spend time with me because that's what they want to do, and it's not appealing to me to essentially make decisions for them. I don't want to make rules and essentially establish any form for power or control over my partner(s). Maybe it comes naturally to me as I'm already an anarchist politically, I dunno, but either way

It's about finding the right people that suit you, really, I think

Specifically they were sexualizing and objectifying her, and she was 17 at the time

Sounds like what you might want is polyamory

I myself relate to what you're saying a lot, with the exception of also wanting/having romantic feelings. I just don't vibe with all that's involved with monogamy

I would rather have someone that's conventionally unattractive and funny than the hottest person in the world with the personality of a wet sponge

Except, you know, attractiveness is subjective, and heavily influenced by your personality

Don't sell yourself short

Vulva/vagina

Why they use a childish term for it is beyond me

And as I mentioned, it's more than just social issues. I say this as a minority of multiple kinds.. and also as someone who isn't American

Your image is literally a leftist position. The concept of class warfare is firmly established in leftist thought. It often does end up associating with the social issues you have in mind, because it's all supported upon the same foundation of, well, creating a society for all, and not for the select few

And as I mentioned, it's more than just social issues. I say this as a minority of multiple kinds.. and also aa someone who isn't American

Your imagine is literally a leftist position. The concept of class warfare is firmly established in leftist thought. It often does end up associating with the social issues you have in mind, because it's all supported upon the same foundation of, well, creating a society for all, and not for the select few

But he was though. He did have an ideology. That ideology was everything in service of himself and other elites/billionaires in society. And what it means to be rich/powerful is a part of that ideology in the first place. Everyone has an ideology, whether they realize it or not

This is what you expect to see in a world with hierarchies and where the rich and powerful are entrenched. Nothing here is unexpected or otherwise incompatible with leftist analysis

In what world could you say that Epstein gave circumstantial support to the left? At what point did he ever support lessening the amount of power the powerful have? Left vs right is far more than just social issues, it's the whole package

Animals don't grow infinitely. If their population surpasses capacity, they have a mass die-off

I don't know why you bring in the ozone layer here. That was not a problem that had anything to do with reaource consumption.

I mean, is Anna's archive under risk even? Yeah, worst case they can get every major DNS to ban them, but that won't stop them from being accessible. And if they operate in a country that doesn't give a shit, they won't face consequences,especially if their opsec is good enough

Not to mention, things are backed up with torrents. If their servers get raided they would be able to restart where they left off

In my eyes, if you got the chance at something major like spotify's entire library, you take it.

But that's literally what I'm arguing for though..?